These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27314974)

  • 1. Comparison of performance of genetics 4N6 FLOQSwabs™ with or without surfactant to rayon swabs.
    Frippiat C; Noel F
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Aug; 42():96-9. PubMed ID: 27314974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nylon flocked swab severely reduces Hexagon Obti sensibility.
    Frippiat C; De Roy G; Fontaine LM; Dognaux S; Noel F; Heudt L; Lepot L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Feb; 247():126-9. PubMed ID: 25575014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
    Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabbing systems for touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces.
    Bonsu DOM; Rodie M; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Dec; 17(4):577-584. PubMed ID: 34674113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
    Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Touch DNA recovery from vehicle surfaces using different swabs.
    Giovanelli A; Grazinoli Garrido R; Rocha A; Hessab T
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):707-711. PubMed ID: 34725823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Recovery of blood traces with scenesafe FAST tape].
    Keller E; Looser M; Bieri HP; Kübler E; Balitzki B
    Arch Kriminol; 2012; 230(5-6):166-76. PubMed ID: 23367791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a novel material, Diomics X-Swab™, for collection of DNA.
    Marshall PL; Stoljarova M; Larue BL; King JL; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():192-8. PubMed ID: 25016249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the efficiency of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabs for recovery of DNA from metal surfaces.
    Bonsu DOM; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Jun; 17(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 33180274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs.
    Bruijns BB; Tiggelaar RM; Gardeniers H
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 29890011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
    Benschop CC; Wiebosch DC; Kloosterman AD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20129470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
    Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualification of high-recovery, flocked swabs as compared to traditional rayon swabs for microbiological environmental monitoring of surfaces.
    Dalmaso G; Bini M; Paroni R; Ferrari M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2008; 62(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 18661868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
    Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance testing of a semi-automatic card punch system, using direct STR profiling of DNA from blood samples on FTA™ cards.
    Ogden SJ; Horton JK; Stubbs SL; Tatnell PJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S207-12. PubMed ID: 25407399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of presumptive blood test kits including hexagon OBTI.
    Johnston E; Ames CE; Dagnall KE; Foster J; Daniel BE
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 May; 53(3):687-9. PubMed ID: 18471215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
    Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantage of ForensiX Swabs in Retrieving and Preserving Biological Fluids.
    Mawlood SK; Alrowaithi M; Watson N
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):686-9. PubMed ID: 25684353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.