These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27315266)

  • 1. Distinct Neural Suppression and Encoding Effects for Conceptual Novelty and Familiarity.
    Reggev N; Bein O; Maril A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1455-70. PubMed ID: 27315266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two separate, but interacting, neural systems for familiarity and novelty detection: a dual-route mechanism.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Hippocampus; 2014 May; 24(5):516-27. PubMed ID: 24436072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates.
    Voss JL; Lucas HD; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2638-51. PubMed ID: 19702474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is a novel conceptual unit more than the sum of its parts?: FMRI evidence from an associative recognition memory study.
    Bader R; Opitz B; Reith W; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Aug; 61():123-34. PubMed ID: 24946317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinctiveness Benefits Novelty (and Not Familiarity), but Only Up to a Limit: The Prior Knowledge Perspective.
    Reggev N; Sharoni R; Maril A
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 42(1):103-128. PubMed ID: 28503806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conceptual and perceptual novelty effects in human medial temporal cortex.
    O'Kane G; Insler RZ; Wagner AD
    Hippocampus; 2005; 15(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. I know I've seen you before: Distinguishing recent-single-exposure-based familiarity from pre-existing familiarity.
    Gimbel SI; Brewer JB; Maril A
    Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 1658():11-24. PubMed ID: 28073651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age differences in the neural correlates of novelty processing: The effects of item-relatedness.
    Bowman CR; Dennis NA
    Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 1612():2-15. PubMed ID: 25149192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Striatal and midbrain connectivity with the hippocampus selectively boosts memory for contextual novelty.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Hippocampus; 2015 Nov; 25(11):1262-73. PubMed ID: 25708843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of item familiarity on the neural correlates of successful associative memory encoding.
    Dennis NA; Turney IC; Webb CE; Overman AA
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 15(4):889-900. PubMed ID: 25939781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural correlates of familiarity and conceptual fluency in a recognition test with ancient pictographic characters.
    Hou M; Safron A; Paller KA; Guo C
    Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 1518():48-60. PubMed ID: 23632379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobes: recollection, familiarity, and novelty.
    Daselaar SM; Fleck MS; Cabeza R
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 96(4):1902-11. PubMed ID: 16738210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal aspects of the feeling of familiarity for music and the emergence of conceptual processing.
    Daltrozzo J; Tillmann B; Platel H; Schön D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1754-69. PubMed ID: 19580391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The hippocampus is sensitive to the mismatch in novelty between items and their contexts.
    Thakral PP; Yu SS; Rugg MD
    Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 1602():144-52. PubMed ID: 25623847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revisiting the novelty effect: when familiarity, not novelty, enhances memory.
    Poppenk J; Köhler S; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1321-30. PubMed ID: 20804299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval.
    Voss JL; Paller KA
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):280-9. PubMed ID: 19457375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Encoding-related brain activity dissociates between the recollective processes underlying successful recall and recognition: a subsequent-memory study.
    Sadeh T; Maril A; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2317-24. PubMed ID: 22683451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. fMRI evidence of equivalent neural suppression by repetition and prior knowledge.
    Poppenk J; McIntosh AR; Moscovitch M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():159-69. PubMed ID: 27461077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Independent contributions of fMRI familiarity and novelty effects to recognition memory and their stability across the adult lifespan.
    de Chastelaine M; Mattson JT; Wang TH; Donley BE; Rugg MD
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():340-351. PubMed ID: 28528847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Building on prior knowledge: schema-dependent encoding processes relate to academic performance.
    van Kesteren MT; Rijpkema M; Ruiter DJ; Morris RG; Fernández G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2250-61. PubMed ID: 24702454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.