These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27315271)

  • 1. What Is Shaping RT and Accuracy Distributions? Active and Selective Response Inhibition Causes the Negative Compatibility Effect.
    Panis S; Schmidt T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 28(11):1651-1671. PubMed ID: 27315271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mask-induced priming and the negative compatibility effect.
    Sumner P
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 18444523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mask-triggered thrust reversal in the negative compatibility effect.
    Schmidt T; Hauch V; Schmidt F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2377-98. PubMed ID: 25967747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The negative compatibility effect with nonmasking flankers: a case for mask-triggered inhibition hypothesis.
    Jaśkowski P
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Sep; 17(3):765-77. PubMed ID: 18226925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual and motor contributions to the negative compatibility effect.
    Liu P; Wang Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():66-73. PubMed ID: 25305593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Negative and positive masked-priming - implications for motor inhibition.
    Sumner P
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2008 Jul; 3(1-2):317-26. PubMed ID: 20517517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The negative compatibility effect with relevant masks: a case for automatic motor inhibition.
    Ocampo B; Finkbeiner M
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():822. PubMed ID: 24265623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reversal of perceptual and motor compatibility effects differs qualitatively between metacontrast and random-line masks.
    Atas A; San Anton E; Cleeremans A
    Psychol Res; 2015 Sep; 79(5):813-28. PubMed ID: 25257260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A neural habituation account of the negative compatibility effect.
    Jacob LPL; Potter KW; Huber DE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Dec; 150(12):2567-2590. PubMed ID: 34014754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibitory mechanisms in single negative priming from ignored and briefly flashed primes: the key role of the inter-stimulus interval.
    Wang Y; Zhao J; Liu P; Wei L; Di M
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Oct; 29():235-47. PubMed ID: 25286132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of nonmasking distractors on the priming of motor responses.
    Jaskowski P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):456-68. PubMed ID: 17469979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continuous priming effects on discrete response choices.
    Wilson AD; Tresilian JR; Schlaghecken F
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Nov; 74(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 20727649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tracing sequential waves of rapid visuomotor activation in lateralized readiness potentials.
    Vath N; Schmidt T
    Neuroscience; 2007 Mar; 145(1):197-208. PubMed ID: 17258867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming.
    Lleras A; Enns JT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Dec; 133(4):475-93. PubMed ID: 15584802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does response link updating contribute to the negative compatibility effect?
    Wang Y; Liu P; Zhao J; Wang Y; Zhao L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 May; 166():42-8. PubMed ID: 27046263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negative congruency effects: a test of the inhibition account.
    Kiesel A; Berner MP; Kunde W
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 17188514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Active masks and active inhibition: a comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jaskowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004).
    Schlaghecken F; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):484-494. PubMed ID: 16846277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A subliminal inhibitory mechanism for the negative compatibility effect: a continuous versus threshold mechanism.
    Liu P; Chen X; Dai D; Wang Y; Wang Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jul; 232(7):2305-15. PubMed ID: 24715101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From sunshine to double arrows: an evaluation window account of negative compatibility effects.
    Klauer KC; Dittrich K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Aug; 139(3):490-519. PubMed ID: 20677896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The negative compatibility effect: unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection.
    Klapp ST; Hinkley LB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 12049243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.