These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2731555)

  • 1. Optimal CT settings for head imaging in the paediatric patient. An analysis of absorbed dose.
    Damilakis JE; Tsouderos JG
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Feb; 9(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 2731555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Average radiation doses in a standard head examination for 250 CT systems.
    McCrohan JL; Patterson JF; Gagne RM; Goldstein HA
    Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):263-8. PubMed ID: 3823446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
    Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol.
    Klink T; Obmann V; Heverhagen J; Stork A; Adam G; Begemann P
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1645-54. PubMed ID: 25037931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient-size-dependent radiation dose optimisation technique for abdominal CT examinations.
    Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 21357583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.
    Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
    Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
    Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
    Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
    Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Average radiation dose in standard CT examinations of the head: results of the 1990 NEXT survey.
    Conway BJ; McCrohan JL; Antonsen RG; Rueter FG; Slayton RJ; Suleiman OH
    Radiology; 1992 Jul; 184(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 1609069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of age-specific Japanese head phantoms for dose evaluation in paediatric head CT examinations.
    Yamauchi-Kawaura C; Fujii K; Akahane K; Yamauchi M; Narai K; Aoyama T; Katsu T; Obara S; Imai K; Ikeda M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb; 163(2):188-201. PubMed ID: 24821932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
    Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT radiation dose and image quality optimization using a porcine model.
    Zarb F; McEntee MF; Rainford L
    Radiol Technol; 2013; 85(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 24255137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring absorbed dose for i-CAT CBCT examinations in child, adolescent and adult phantoms.
    Choi E; Ford NL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(6):20150018. PubMed ID: 25785822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
    Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Lindblom M; Choy G; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Blake MA; Persson A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Fundamental studies on computed tomography (8th report)--radiation absorbed dose under cranial computed tomographic condition (for eight models of scanners) (author's transl)].
    Mano I; Kaneko M; Takenaka E; Fujii K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1979 May; 39(5):528-35. PubMed ID: 482072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Virtual single-source computed tomography using dual-source acquisition: a new technique for the dose-neutral intraindividual comparison of different scan protocols.
    Werncke T; Meyer BC; Wacker FK; von Falck C
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):742-8. PubMed ID: 24918463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pointers for optimizing radiation dose in head CT protocols.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Thrall JH; Mahesh M
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Aug; 8(8):591-3. PubMed ID: 21807356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anthropomorphic phantoms for computed tomography scanner performance evaluation.
    McCullough EC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1978 Jan; 2(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 670462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.