These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27316945)

  • 1. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by mode of detection and tumor size: a case-control study.
    Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Apicella C; Stone J; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Jun; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 27316945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by tumor characteristics: a case-control study.
    Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Stone J; McLean C; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):859. PubMed ID: 29246131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Dite GS; Stone J; MacInnis RJ; Dowty JG; Bickerstaffe A; Aujard K; Rommens JM; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):652-661. PubMed ID: 28338721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjusting for BMI in analyses of volumetric mammographic density and breast cancer risk.
    Hudson S; Vik Hjerkind K; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Trewin C; Ursin G; Dos-Santos-Silva I; De Stavola BL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):156. PubMed ID: 30594212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal Study of Mammographic Density Measures That Predict Breast Cancer Risk.
    Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Stone J; Simpson JA; Severi G; Evans CF; MacInnis RJ; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Apr; 26(4):651-660. PubMed ID: 28062399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interval breast cancer risk associations with breast density, family history and breast tissue aging.
    Nguyen TL; Li S; Dite GS; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh HN; Baglietto L; Stone J; Song YM; Sung J; English DR; Jenkins MA; Dugué PA; Milne RL; Southey MC; Giles GG; Pike MC; Hopper JL
    Int J Cancer; 2020 Jul; 147(2):375-382. PubMed ID: 31609476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
    Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Case-control study of mammographic density and breast cancer risk using processed digital mammograms.
    Habel LA; Lipson JA; Achacoso N; Rothstein JH; Yaffe MJ; Liang RY; Acton L; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL; Sieh W
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 May; 18(1):53. PubMed ID: 27209070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
    Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The distribution and determinants of mammographic density measures in Western Australian aboriginal women.
    McLean K; Darcey E; Cadby G; Lund H; Pilkington L; Redfern A; Thompson S; Saunders C; Wylie E; Stone J
    Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 30819215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic features associated with interval breast cancers in screening programs.
    Boyd NF; Huszti E; Melnichouk O; Martin LJ; Hislop G; Chiarelli A; Yaffe MJ; Minkin S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):417. PubMed ID: 25346388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast Cancer Risk Associations with Digital Mammographic Density by Pixel Brightness Threshold and Mammographic System.
    Nguyen TL; Choi YH; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh NH; Li S; Dite GS; Kim MS; Brennan PC; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Song YM; Hopper JL
    Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):433-442. PubMed ID: 29040039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammographic non-dense area and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: a causal inference approach in a case-control study.
    Velásquez García HA; Sobolev BG; Gotay CC; Wilson CM; Lohrisch CA; Lai AS; Aronson KJ; Spinelli JJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(1):159-168. PubMed ID: 29516373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of Cancer Masking in Screening Mammography Using Density and Textural Features.
    Mainprize JG; Alonzo-Proulx O; Alshafeiy TI; Patrie JT; Harvey JA; Yaffe MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):608-619. PubMed ID: 30100155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure.
    Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Maskarinec G; Li S; Dite GS; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh HN; Baglietto L; Stone J; Song YM; Sung J; MacInnis RJ; Dugué PA; Dowty JG; Jenkins MA; Milne RL; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Int J Cancer; 2021 May; 148(9):2193-2202. PubMed ID: 33197272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using mammographic density to predict breast cancer risk: dense area or percentage dense area.
    Stone J; Ding J; Warren RM; Duffy SW; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2010; 12(6):R97. PubMed ID: 21087468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
    Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term prognostic implications of risk factors associated with tumor size: a case study of women regularly attending screening.
    Strand F; Humphreys K; Holm J; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Azavedo E; Czene K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Apr; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 29669579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.