BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27316945)

  • 1. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by mode of detection and tumor size: a case-control study.
    Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Apicella C; Stone J; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Jun; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 27316945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by tumor characteristics: a case-control study.
    Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Stone J; McLean C; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):859. PubMed ID: 29246131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Dite GS; Stone J; MacInnis RJ; Dowty JG; Bickerstaffe A; Aujard K; Rommens JM; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):652-661. PubMed ID: 28338721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjusting for BMI in analyses of volumetric mammographic density and breast cancer risk.
    Hudson S; Vik Hjerkind K; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Trewin C; Ursin G; Dos-Santos-Silva I; De Stavola BL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):156. PubMed ID: 30594212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal Study of Mammographic Density Measures That Predict Breast Cancer Risk.
    Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Stone J; Simpson JA; Severi G; Evans CF; MacInnis RJ; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Apr; 26(4):651-660. PubMed ID: 28062399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interval breast cancer risk associations with breast density, family history and breast tissue aging.
    Nguyen TL; Li S; Dite GS; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh HN; Baglietto L; Stone J; Song YM; Sung J; English DR; Jenkins MA; Dugué PA; Milne RL; Southey MC; Giles GG; Pike MC; Hopper JL
    Int J Cancer; 2020 Jul; 147(2):375-382. PubMed ID: 31609476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
    Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Case-control study of mammographic density and breast cancer risk using processed digital mammograms.
    Habel LA; Lipson JA; Achacoso N; Rothstein JH; Yaffe MJ; Liang RY; Acton L; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL; Sieh W
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 May; 18(1):53. PubMed ID: 27209070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
    Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The distribution and determinants of mammographic density measures in Western Australian aboriginal women.
    McLean K; Darcey E; Cadby G; Lund H; Pilkington L; Redfern A; Thompson S; Saunders C; Wylie E; Stone J
    Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 30819215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic features associated with interval breast cancers in screening programs.
    Boyd NF; Huszti E; Melnichouk O; Martin LJ; Hislop G; Chiarelli A; Yaffe MJ; Minkin S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):417. PubMed ID: 25346388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast Cancer Risk Associations with Digital Mammographic Density by Pixel Brightness Threshold and Mammographic System.
    Nguyen TL; Choi YH; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh NH; Li S; Dite GS; Kim MS; Brennan PC; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Song YM; Hopper JL
    Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):433-442. PubMed ID: 29040039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammographic non-dense area and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: a causal inference approach in a case-control study.
    Velásquez García HA; Sobolev BG; Gotay CC; Wilson CM; Lohrisch CA; Lai AS; Aronson KJ; Spinelli JJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(1):159-168. PubMed ID: 29516373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of Cancer Masking in Screening Mammography Using Density and Textural Features.
    Mainprize JG; Alonzo-Proulx O; Alshafeiy TI; Patrie JT; Harvey JA; Yaffe MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):608-619. PubMed ID: 30100155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure.
    Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Maskarinec G; Li S; Dite GS; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh HN; Baglietto L; Stone J; Song YM; Sung J; MacInnis RJ; Dugué PA; Dowty JG; Jenkins MA; Milne RL; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Int J Cancer; 2021 May; 148(9):2193-2202. PubMed ID: 33197272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using mammographic density to predict breast cancer risk: dense area or percentage dense area.
    Stone J; Ding J; Warren RM; Duffy SW; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2010; 12(6):R97. PubMed ID: 21087468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
    Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term prognostic implications of risk factors associated with tumor size: a case study of women regularly attending screening.
    Strand F; Humphreys K; Holm J; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Azavedo E; Czene K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Apr; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 29669579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.