260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27317159)
1. Quality of Web-based Information for the 10 Most Common Fractures.
Memon M; Ginsberg L; Simunovic N; Ristevski B; Bhandari M; Kleinlugtenbelt YV
Interact J Med Res; 2016 Jun; 5(2):e19. PubMed ID: 27317159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A critical appraisal of web-based information on shoulder pain comparing biomedical vs. psychosocial information.
Barrett DR; Boone JD; Butch JO; Cavender JA; Sole G; Wassinger CA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e23-e32. PubMed ID: 36108880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis.
Annesi T; Steinway C; Oluwole T; Shilly S; Szalda D; Myers R; Chen J; Jan S
JMIR Pediatr Parent; 2023 Dec; 6():e48924. PubMed ID: 38100579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Quality of Printed Online Education Materials in Cosmetic Facial Plastic Surgery.
Alwani MM; Campiti VJ; Bandali EH; Nesemeier BR; Ting JY; Shipchandler TZ
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2020; 22(4):255-261. PubMed ID: 32267787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines.
Raj S; Sharma VL; Singh AJ; Goel S
Adv Prev Med; 2016; 2016():4815285. PubMed ID: 27119025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.
Aboalshamat K
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):797. PubMed ID: 37880640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anaesthesia for total hip and knee replacement: A review of patient education materials available online.
Marshall R; Pomeroy E; McKendry C; Gilmartin M; McQuail P; Johnson M
F1000Res; 2019; 8():416. PubMed ID: 33335711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?
Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Bader E; Hoeltzel GD; Joshi ART; Williams NN; Dumon KR
Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e195-e200. PubMed ID: 36588086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.
Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
Özduran E; Hanci V
Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readability and Quality of Online Information on Osteoarthritis: An Objective Analysis With Historic Comparison.
Murray KE; Murray TE; O'Rourke AC; Low C; Veale DJ
Interact J Med Res; 2019 Sep; 8(3):e12855. PubMed ID: 31538953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.
Alpaydın MT; Buyuk SK; Canigur Bavbek N
J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):1-12. PubMed ID: 34269827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on COVID-19: an infodemiological study.
Halboub E; Al-Ak'hali MS; Al-Mekhlafi HM; Alhajj MN
BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 33461516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.
Bompastore NJ; Cisu T; Holoch P
Urology; 2018 Aug; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 29723588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
