These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27317159)

  • 21. Varicocele Embolization: An Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Online Patient Information.
    Alderson JH; O'Neil DC; Redmond CE; Mulholland D; Lee MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):841-846. PubMed ID: 31494004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does Google™ Have the Answers? The Internet-based Information on Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures.
    Murphy EP; Fenelon C; Murphy F; Baig MN; Murphy RP; Diack M; Leonard M
    Cureus; 2019 Oct; 11(10):e5952. PubMed ID: 31799093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Concussion information online: evaluation of information quality, content and readability of concussion-related websites.
    Ahmed OH; Sullivan SJ; Schneiders AG; McCrory PR
    Br J Sports Med; 2012 Jul; 46(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 21504964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Readability and quality assessment of websites related to microtia and aural atresia.
    Alamoudi U; Hong P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 79(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 25554575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Official Websites Providing Information on COVID-19 Vaccination: Readability and Content Analysis.
    Yeung AWK; Wochele-Thoma T; Eibensteiner F; Klager E; Hribersek M; Parvanov ED; Hrg D; Völkl-Kernstock S; Kletecka-Pulker M; Schaden E; Willschke H; Atanasov AG
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2022 Mar; 8(3):e34003. PubMed ID: 35073276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating asthma websites using the Brief DISCERN instrument.
    Banasiak NC; Meadows-Oliver M
    J Asthma Allergy; 2017; 10():191-196. PubMed ID: 28670135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.
    Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.
    Ahmadi O; Louw J; Leinonen H; Gan PYC
    Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 35(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 33769170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?
    Awal DH; Mills C
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 56(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 29307586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient.
    Plambeck B; Jiang J; Perez J; Wordekemper BE; Fu D; Colvin A; Deibert CM
    Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e34240. PubMed ID: 36852349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
    Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Proximal Humerus Fracture: An Evaluation of the Readability and Value of Web-Based Knowledge.
    Elshohna M; Hidayat Y; Karkuri A
    Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e27957. PubMed ID: 36120225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?
    Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK
    Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Online Patient Education Materials on Iron Deficiency Anemia Are Too Difficult to Read and Low Quality: A Readability and Quality Analysis.
    Kulhari S; Ahn AB; Xu J; Rhee J; Cooper G
    Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e46902. PubMed ID: 37954716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.
    Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E
    Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy.
    Byrne J; Keogh S; Cullinane C; Razzaq Z; Redmond HP
    OTO Open; 2022; 6(4):2473974X221133308. PubMed ID: 36311181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.
    Mehta N; Gupta A; Nissan M
    Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 35(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31412380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variable Quality and Readability of Patient-oriented Websites on Colorectal Cancer Screening.
    Schreuders EH; Grobbee EJ; Kuipers EJ; Spaander MC; Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):79-85.e3. PubMed ID: 27404964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.