275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27317475)
1. Extralevator vs conventional abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Negoi I; Hostiuc S; Paun S; Negoi RI; Beuran M
Am J Surg; 2016 Sep; 212(3):511-26. PubMed ID: 27317475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the short-term outcome.
Zhou X; Sun T; Xie H; Zhang Y; Zeng H; Fu W
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):474-81. PubMed ID: 25704132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Meta-analysis of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer].
Chen Y; Chi P
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 20(3):326-332. PubMed ID: 28338169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extralevator with vs nonextralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: the RELAPe randomized controlled trial.
Bianco F; Romano G; Tsarkov P; Stanojevic G; Shroyer K; Giuratrabocchetta S; Bergamaschi R;
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 19(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 27369739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Perdawood SK; Lund T
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Mar; 19(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 25384360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Meta-analysis of extralevator abdominoperineal excision and conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer].
Jiang HY; Zhou YB; Zhang DF
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 16(7):622-7. PubMed ID: 23888442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.
Stelzner S; Hellmich G; Sims A; Kittner T; Puffer E; Zimmer J; Bleyl D; Witzigmann H
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1729-37. PubMed ID: 27631643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after extralevator abdominoperineal excision and standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yu HC; Peng H; He XS; Zhao RS
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Feb; 29(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 24271080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trans-perineal minimally invasive approach during extralevator abdominoperineal excision for advanced low rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Han JG; Wang ZJ; Wei GH; Zhai ZW; Zhao BC
Asian J Surg; 2020 Aug; 43(8):819-825. PubMed ID: 31982269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up.
Carpelan A; Karvonen J; Varpe P; Rantala A; Kaljonen A; Grönroos J; Huhtinen H
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Apr; 33(4):375-381. PubMed ID: 29445870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A pilot randomized study comparing extralevator with conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Seshadri RA; West NP; Sundersingh S
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 19(7):O253-O262. PubMed ID: 28503808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extralevatory abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) does not result in reduced rate of tumor perforation or rate of positive circumferential resection margin: a nationwide database study.
Klein M; Fischer A; Rosenberg J; Gögenur I;
Ann Surg; 2015 May; 261(5):933-8. PubMed ID: 25211268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Local recurrence after 'standard' abdominoperineal resection: do we really need ELAPE?
Xanthis A; Greenberg D; Jha B; Olafimihan O; Miller R; Fearnhead N; Davies J; Hall N
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2018 Feb; 100(2):111-115. PubMed ID: 29022795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer--short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted.
Prytz M; Angenete E; Ekelund J; Haglind E
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 29(8):981-7. PubMed ID: 24950793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Advantage of extralevator abdominoperineal excision comparing to the conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a Meta-analysis].
Wang Q; Xu C; Wang J; Ren Q; Cao J
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Mar; 42(3):320-327. PubMed ID: 28364107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer--Extensive Surgery to Be Used With Discretion Based on 3-Year Local Recurrence Results: A Registry-based, Observational National Cohort Study.
Prytz M; Angenete E; Bock D; Haglind E
Ann Surg; 2016 Mar; 263(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 25906414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Research progression of extralevator abdominoperineal excision].
Xu HR; Xu ZF; Li ZJ
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 16(7):698-700. PubMed ID: 23888456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standard versus extralevator abdominoperineal low rectal cancer excision outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
De Nardi P; Summo V; Vignali A; Capretti G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2997-3006. PubMed ID: 25605518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extralevator abdominoperineal resection in the prone position.
Flor-Lorente B; Frasson M; Montilla E
Cir Esp; 2014 Mar; 92 Suppl 1():30-9. PubMed ID: 24842689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life.
Vaughan-Shaw PG; Cheung T; Knight JS; Nichols PH; Pilkington SA; Mirnezami AH
Tech Coloproctol; 2012 Oct; 16(5):355-62. PubMed ID: 22777690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
