BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27317509)

  • 1. Efficient determination of accurate atomic polarizabilities for polarizeable embedding calculations.
    Schröder H; Schwabe T
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Aug; 37(22):2052-9. PubMed ID: 27317509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multipole moments for embedding potentials: Exploring different atomic allocation algorithms.
    S Nørby M; Magnus Haugaard Olsen J; Kongsted J; Aagard Jensen HJ
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Jul; 37(20):1887-96. PubMed ID: 27187063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Solvation Effects on Electronic Transitions: Exploring the Performance of Advanced Solvent Potentials in Polarizable Embedding Calculations.
    Schwabe T; Olsen JM; Sneskov K; Kongsted J; Christiansen O
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 Jul; 7(7):2209-17. PubMed ID: 26606490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Averaged Solvent Embedding Potential Parameters for Multiscale Modeling of Molecular Properties.
    Beerepoot MT; Steindal AH; List NH; Kongsted J; Olsen JM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Apr; 12(4):1684-95. PubMed ID: 26938368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molecule-specific determination of atomic polarizabilities with the polarizable atomic multipole model.
    Woo Kim H; Rhee YM
    J Comput Chem; 2012 Jul; 33(20):1662-72. PubMed ID: 22565616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of distributed multipoles and polarizabilities: comparison between the LoProp and MpProp models.
    Söderhjelm P; Krogh JW; Karlström G; Ryde U; Lindh R
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Apr; 28(6):1083-90. PubMed ID: 17279548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local decomposition of imaginary polarizabilities and dispersion coefficients.
    Harczuk I; Nagy B; Jensen F; Vahtras O; Ågren H
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2017 Aug; 19(30):20241-20250. PubMed ID: 28726873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An averaged polarizable potential for multiscale modeling in phospholipid membranes.
    Witzke S; List NH; Olsen JM; Steinmann C; Petersen M; Beerepoot MT; Kongsted J
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Apr; 38(9):601-611. PubMed ID: 28160294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-Effective Potential for Accurate Polarizable Embedding Calculations in Protein Environments.
    Reinholdt P; Kjellgren ER; Steinmann C; Olsen JMH
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Feb; 16(2):1162-1174. PubMed ID: 31855427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of Electrostatic Parameters for a Polarizable Force Field Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator.
    Anisimov VM; Lamoureux G; Vorobyov IV; Huang N; Roux B; MacKerell AD
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2005 Jan; 1(1):153-68. PubMed ID: 26641126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extension of the D3 dispersion coefficient model.
    Caldeweyher E; Bannwarth C; Grimme S
    J Chem Phys; 2017 Jul; 147(3):034112. PubMed ID: 28734285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Quality of the Embedding Potential Is Decisive for Minimal Quantum Region Size in Embedding Calculations: The Case of the Green Fluorescent Protein.
    Nåbo LJ; Olsen JMH; Martínez TJ; Kongsted J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Dec; 13(12):6230-6236. PubMed ID: 29099597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dipole and quadrupole polarizabilities of the water molecule as a function of geometry.
    Loboda O; Ingrosso F; Ruiz-López MF; Reis H; Millot C
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Sep; 37(23):2125-32. PubMed ID: 27354163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate Molecular Crystal Lattice Energies from a Fragment QM/MM Approach with On-the-Fly Ab Initio Force Field Parametrization.
    Wen S; Beran GJ
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 Nov; 7(11):3733-42. PubMed ID: 26598268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partitioning of higher multipole polarizabilities: numerical evaluation of transferability.
    Geldof D; Krishtal A; Geerlings P; Van Alsenoy C
    J Phys Chem A; 2011 Nov; 115(45):13096-103. PubMed ID: 21916519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Polarizable density embedding: a new QM/QM/MM-based computational strategy.
    Olsen JM; Steinmann C; Ruud K; Kongsted J
    J Phys Chem A; 2015 May; 119(21):5344-55. PubMed ID: 25594604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the isotropy of induced multipole moments in heavy ion complexes.
    Trumm M
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Mar; 39(7):373-379. PubMed ID: 29159816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling Rayleigh Scattering of Aerosol Particles.
    Harczuk I; Vahtras O; Ågren H
    J Phys Chem B; 2016 May; 120(18):4296-301. PubMed ID: 27097131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational Approach for Studying Optical Properties of DNA Systems in Solution.
    Nørby MS; Steinmann C; Olsen JM; Li H; Kongsted J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Oct; 12(10):5050-5057. PubMed ID: 27585250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polarizable atomic multipole-based force field for cholesterol.
    Li Y; Liu Y; Yang B; Li G; Chu H
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2023 Aug; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 37565356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.