179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27317667)
1. Comparison of Gated Audiovisual Speech Identification in Elderly Hearing Aid Users and Elderly Normal-Hearing Individuals: Effects of Adding Visual Cues to Auditory Speech Stimuli.
Moradi S; Lidestam B; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gated auditory speech perception in elderly hearing aid users and elderly normal-hearing individuals: effects of hearing impairment and cognitive capacity.
Moradi S; Lidestam B; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2014 Jul; 18():. PubMed ID: 25085610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual Cues Contribute Differentially to Audiovisual Perception of Consonants and Vowels in Improving Recognition and Reducing Cognitive Demands in Listeners With Hearing Impairment Using Hearing Aids.
Moradi S; Lidestam B; Danielsson H; Ng EHN; Rönnberg J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 60(9):2687-2703. PubMed ID: 28651255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gated audiovisual speech identification in silence vs. noise: effects on time and accuracy.
Moradi S; Lidestam B; Rönnberg J
Front Psychol; 2013; 4():359. PubMed ID: 23801980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gated auditory speech perception: effects of listening conditions and cognitive capacity.
Moradi S; Lidestam B; Saremi A; Rönnberg J
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():531. PubMed ID: 24926274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Efficacy of Short-term Gated Audiovisual Speech Training for Improving Auditory Sentence Identification in Noise in Elderly Hearing Aid Users.
Moradi S; Wahlin A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J; Lidestam B
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():368. PubMed ID: 28348542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Audiovisual training is better than auditory-only training for auditory-only speech-in-noise identification.
Lidestam B; Moradi S; Pettersson R; Ricklefs T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL142-7. PubMed ID: 25096138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing.
Tye-Murray N; Sommers MS; Spehar B
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):656-68. PubMed ID: 17804980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Audiovisual sentence repetition as a clinical criterion for auditory development in Persian-language children with hearing loss.
Oryadi-Zanjani MM; Vahab M; Rahimi Z; Mayahi A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 93():167-171. PubMed ID: 28109491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
Başkent D; Bazo D
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Face Masks Impact Auditory and Audiovisual Consonant Recognition in Children With and Without Hearing Loss.
Lalonde K; Buss E; Miller MK; Leibold LJ
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():874345. PubMed ID: 35645844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audio-visual speech perception in noise: Implanted children and young adults versus normal hearing peers.
Taitelbaum-Swead R; Fostick L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 92():146-150. PubMed ID: 28012517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
