BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27317711)

  • 1. Predictors of difficult videolaryngoscopy with GlideScope® or C-MAC® with D-blade: secondary analysis from a large comparative videolaryngoscopy trial.
    Aziz MF; Bayman EO; Van Tienderen MM; Todd MM; ; Brambrink AM
    Br J Anaesth; 2016 Jul; 117(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 27317711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population.
    Aziz MF; Abrons RO; Cattano D; Bayman EO; Swanson DE; Hagberg CA; Todd MM; Brambrink AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Mar; 122(3):740-750. PubMed ID: 26579847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomised clinical trial comparing the 'sniffing' and neutral position using channelled (KingVision
    Mendonca C; Ungureanu N; Nowicka A; Kumar P
    Anaesthesia; 2018 Jul; 73(7):847-855. PubMed ID: 29660807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways.
    Serocki G; Neumann T; Scharf E; Dörges V; Cavus E
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2013 Feb; 79(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 23032922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].
    Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR
    Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standard clinical risk factors for difficult laryngoscopy are not independent predictors of intubation success with the GlideScope.
    Díaz-Gómez JL; Satyapriya A; Satyapriya SV; Mascha EJ; Yang D; Krakovitz P; Mossad EB; Eikermann M; Doyle DJ
    J Clin Anesth; 2011 Dec; 23(8):603-10. PubMed ID: 22137510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The efficacy of GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy in children who are difficult to intubate: an analysis from the paediatric difficult intubation registry.
    Park R; Peyton JM; Fiadjoe JE; Hunyady AI; Kimball T; Zurakowski D; Kovatsis PG; ;
    Br J Anaesth; 2017 Nov; 119(5):984-992. PubMed ID: 29028952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
    van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
    Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the incidence of sore throat postoperatively increase with the use of a traditional intubation blade or the GlideScope?
    Cirilla DJ; Ngo J; Vaisman V; Daly C; Ata A; Sandison M; Roberts K
    J Clin Anesth; 2015 Dec; 27(8):646-51. PubMed ID: 26277231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time-to-intubation in obese patients. A randomized study comparing direct laryngoscopy and videolaryngoscopy in experienced anesthetists.
    Ander F; Magnuson A; Berggren L; Ahlstrand R; de Leon A
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2017 Sep; 83(9):906-913. PubMed ID: 28358178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Difficult airway management in the emergency department: GlideScope videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy.
    Mosier JM; Stolz U; Chiu S; Sakles JC
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Jun; 42(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 21911279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.
    Kleine-Brueggeney M; Greif R; Schoettker P; Savoldelli GL; Nabecker S; Theiler LG
    Br J Anaesth; 2016 May; 116(5):670-9. PubMed ID: 27106971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Videolaryngoscopy with glidescope reduces cervical spine movement in patients with unsecured cervical spine.
    Kill C; Risse J; Wallot P; Seidl P; Steinfeldt T; Wulf H
    J Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 44(4):750-6. PubMed ID: 23351572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of videolaryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in predicted difficult airway: a feasibility study.
    Vargas M; Pastore A; Aloj F; Laffey JG; Servillo G
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):25. PubMed ID: 28219331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.
    Aziz MF; Dillman D; Fu R; Brambrink AM
    Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 22261795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Videolaryngoscopy versus Fiber-optic Intubation through a Supraglottic Airway in Children with a Difficult Airway: An Analysis from the Multicenter Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry.
    Burjek NE; Nishisaki A; Fiadjoe JE; Adams HD; Peeples KN; Raman VT; Olomu PN; Kovatsis PG; Jagannathan N; Hunyady A; Bosenberg A; Tham S; Low D; Hopkins P; Glover C; Olutoye O; Szmuk P; McCloskey J; Dalesio N; Koka R; Greenberg R; Watkins S; Patel V; Reynolds P; Matuszczak M; Jain R; Khalil S; Polaner D; Zieg J; Szolnoki J; Sathyamoorthy K; Taicher B; Riveros Perez NR; Bhattacharya S; Bhalla T; Stricker P; Lockman J; Galvez J; Rehman M; Von Ungern-Sternberg B; Sommerfield D; Soneru C; Chiao F; Richtsfeld M; Belani K; Sarmiento L; Mireles S; Bilen Rosas G; Park R; Peyton J;
    Anesthesiology; 2017 Sep; 127(3):432-440. PubMed ID: 28650415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between the GlideScope® classic and GlideScope® direct video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation.
    Heuer JF; Heitmann S; Crozier TA; Bleckmann A; Quintel M; Russo SG
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():330-6. PubMed ID: 27555188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Videolaryngoscopy for Physician-Based, Prehospital Emergency Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Comparison of Different Blade Types Using A.P. Advance, C-MAC System, and KingVision.
    Cavus E; Janssen S; Reifferscheid F; Caliebe A; Callies A; von der Heyden M; Knacke PG; Doerges V
    Anesth Analg; 2018 May; 126(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 29239965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yumul R; Elvir-Lazo OL; White PF; Sloninsky A; Kaplan M; Kariger R; Naruse R; Parker N; Pham C; Zhang X; Wender RH
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():71-7. PubMed ID: 27185681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.