BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27318601)

  • 1. Ultraviolet spectral distribution and erythema-weighted irradiance from indoor tanning devices compared with solar radiation exposures.
    Sola Y; Baeza D; Gómez M; Lorente J
    J Photochem Photobiol B; 2016 Aug; 161():450-5. PubMed ID: 27318601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultraviolet exposure from indoor tanning devices: a systematic review.
    Nilsen LT; Hannevik M; Veierød MB
    Br J Dermatol; 2016 Apr; 174(4):730-40. PubMed ID: 26749382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variability of pre-vitamin D3 effectiveness of UV appliances for skin tanning.
    Sayre RM; Dowdy JC; Shepherd JG
    J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 2010 Jul; 121(1-2):331-3. PubMed ID: 20398765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of UVA irradiance to the erythema and photoaging effects in solar and sunbed exposures.
    Sola Y; Lorente J
    J Photochem Photobiol B; 2015 Feb; 143():5-11. PubMed ID: 25579807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analyzing UV-B narrowband solar irradiance: comparison with erythemal and vitamin D production irradiances.
    Sola Y; Lorente J; Ossó A
    J Photochem Photobiol B; 2012 Dec; 117():90-6. PubMed ID: 23092623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. UVB and UVA irradiances from indoor tanning devices.
    Nilsen LT; Aalerud TN; Hannevik M; Veierød MB
    Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2011 Jul; 10(7):1129-36. PubMed ID: 21445424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective determination of Fitzpatrick skin type.
    Ravnbak MH
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Aug; 57(8):B4153. PubMed ID: 20682135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of erythema-effective solar radiation in Japan and Germany with a spore monolayer film optimized for the detection of UVB and UVA--results of a field campaign.
    Furusawa Y; Quintern LE; Holtschmidt H; Koepke P; Saito M
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 1998 Nov; 50(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 9866178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [understanding and radiation hygiene assessment of solar UV exposure in Germany].
    Steinmetz M; Matthes R; Hofmann P; Brix G
    Z Med Phys; 2001; 11(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 11820179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Midsummer solar UV-radiation in Finland compared with the UV-radiation from phototherapeutic devices measured by different techniques.
    Kolari PJ; Lauharanta J; Hoikkala M
    Photodermatol; 1986 Dec; 3(6):340-5. PubMed ID: 3588354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends in UV irradiance of tanning devices in Norway: 1983-2005.
    Nilsen LT; Hannevik M; Aalerud TN; Johnsen B; Friberg EG; Veierød MB
    Photochem Photobiol; 2008; 84(5):1100-8. PubMed ID: 18399922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of erythemal UV effective irradiance from UV lamp exposure and the application in shield metal arc welding processing.
    Chang CP; Liu HH; Peng CY; Fang HY; Tsao TH; Lan CH
    Health Phys; 2008 Apr; 94(4):318-27. PubMed ID: 18332723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Solar ultraviolet doses and vitamin D in a northern mid-latitude.
    Serrano MA; Cañada J; Moreno JC; Gurrea G
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 574():744-750. PubMed ID: 27664761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An algorithm to evaluate solar irradiance and effective dose rates using spectral UV irradiance at four selected wavelengths.
    Anav A; Rafanelli C; Di Menno I; Di Menno M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 15266087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nail dryer devices: a measured spectral irradiance and labelling review.
    Baeza D; Sola Y; Del Río LA; González R
    Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2018 May; 17(5):592-598. PubMed ID: 29632943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Erythemal and vitamin D weighted solar UV dose-rates and doses estimated from measurements in mainland France and on Réunion Island.
    Brogniez C; Doré JF; Auriol F; Cesarini P; Minvielle F; Deroo C; Catalfamo M; Metzger JM; Da Conceicao P
    J Photochem Photobiol B; 2021 Dec; 225():112330. PubMed ID: 34678614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct comparison between the angular distributions of the erythemal and eye-damaging UV irradiances: a pilot study.
    Schouten P; Parisi AV
    J Photochem Photobiol B; 2011 Feb; 102(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 21112218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the relationship between erythemal and vitamin D action spectrum weighted ultraviolet radiation.
    Fioletov VE; McArthur LJ; Mathews TW; Marrett L
    J Photochem Photobiol B; 2009 Apr; 95(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 19150601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. UV-B radiometry and dosimetry for solar measurements.
    Wong CF; Toomey S; Fleming RA; Thomas BW
    Health Phys; 1995 Feb; 68(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 7814251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. UV emissions from artificial tanning devices and their compliance with the European technical standard.
    Facta S; Fusette SS; Bonino A; Anglesio L; d'Amore G
    Health Phys; 2013 Apr; 104(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 23439142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.