These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27320394)

  • 1. The design and implementation of a proficiency test for assessors of fingermark quality, to facilitate collaborative practise in fingermark research.
    Fieldhouse S; Gwinnett C
    Sci Justice; 2016 Jul; 56(4):231-40. PubMed ID: 27320394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of some of the factors influencing fingermark detection.
    Chadwick S; Moret S; Jayashanka N; Lennard C; Spindler X; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():381-389. PubMed ID: 29960948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 2016 ENFSI Fingerprint Working Group testing programme.
    Zampa F; Fish J; Hilgert M; Lövby T; Svensson M; Vaughan J; Mattei A;
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Nov; 292():148-162. PubMed ID: 30312945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consistency and reproducibility in fingermark deposition.
    Fieldhouse S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Apr; 207(1-3):96-100. PubMed ID: 20947274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of latent fingermarks by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging of endogenous lipids.
    Wolstenholme R; Bradshaw R; Clench MR; Francese S
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2009 Oct; 23(19):3031-9. PubMed ID: 19711300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The potential (negative) influence of observational biases at the analysis stage of fingermark individualisation.
    Schiffer B; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):116-20. PubMed ID: 16876354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guidelines for the use and statistical analysis of the Home Office fingermark grading scheme for comparing fingermark development techniques.
    Hockey D; Dove A; Kent T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110604. PubMed ID: 33278696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of inkjet printed amino acid fingerprint test targets for ninhydrin process monitoring - and some observations.
    Croxton R; Kent T; Littlewood A; Smith M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110741. PubMed ID: 33706072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiating individuals through the chemical composition of their fingermarks.
    Gorka M; Thomas A; Bécue A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 May; 346():111645. PubMed ID: 36996582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ENFSI collaborative testing programme for fingermarks: Past experiences and future perspectives.
    Mattei A; Fish J; Hilgert M; Lövby T; Svensson M; Vaughan J; Zampa F;
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():282-301. PubMed ID: 28433824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of scanning Kelvin probe with SEM/EPMA techniques for fingermark recovery from metallic surfaces.
    Challinger SE; Baikie ID; Flannigan G; Halls S; Laing K; Daly L; Nic Daeid N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():44-52. PubMed ID: 30138750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fingermark age determinations: Legal considerations, review of the literature and practical propositions.
    Girod A; Ramotowski R; Lambrechts S; Misrielal P; Aalders M; Weyermann C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():212-26. PubMed ID: 27044033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proteomics as a new tool to study fingermark ageing in forensics.
    Oonk S; Schuurmans T; Pabst M; de Smet LCPM; de Puit M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16425. PubMed ID: 30401937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fingermark quality assessment, a transversal study of subjective quality scales.
    Hanna T; Chadwick S; Moret S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Sep; 350():111783. PubMed ID: 37453206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lipid composition of fingermark residue and donor classification using GC/MS.
    Girod A; Weyermann C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():68-82. PubMed ID: 24675043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a printed quality control test strip for the analysis and imaging of fingermark composition.
    Gorka M; Thomas A; Bécue A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Dec; 329():111063. PubMed ID: 34736048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of DNA recovery on the subsequent quality of latent fingermarks.
    Fieldhouse S; Oravcova E; Walton-Williams L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():78-88. PubMed ID: 27572637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proficiency testing in laboratory medicine: uses and limitations.
    Shahangian S
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jan; 122(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 9448012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the effects of routine fingermark detection techniques on the subsequent recovery and analysis of explosive residues on various substrates.
    King S; Benson S; Kelly T; Lennard C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):257-64. PubMed ID: 24314527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fingermark submission decision-making within a UK fingerprint laboratory: Do experts get the marks that they need?
    Earwaker H; Morgan RM; Harris AJ; Hall LJ
    Sci Justice; 2015 Jul; 55(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 26087871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.