337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27320647)
1. [Initial experience in the laparoscopic treatment of benign and malignant gynaecological diseases in the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad in Oaxaca].
Vásquez-Ciriaco S; Isla-Ortiz D; Palomeque-Lopez A; García-Espinoza JA; Jarquín-Arremilla A; Lechuga-García NA
Cir Cir; 2017; 85(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 27320647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM].
Kovachev S; Ganovska A; Stankova T
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55 Suppl 1 Pt 1():4-10. PubMed ID: 27514161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using a percutaneous surgical system: a pilot study towards scarless surgery.
Rossitto C; Gueli Alletti S; Rotolo S; Cianci S; Panico G; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():132-5. PubMed ID: 27289066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Analysis of perioperative complications and influencing factors of complications in 1 000 cases of robotic gynecological surgery].
Huang XT; Ji M; Zhao Z; He NN; Li Y; Xu PL; Zhang JF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 May; 56(5):341-348. PubMed ID: 34034421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology.
Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Walz J; Bannier M; Buttarelli M; Gurriet B; De Laparrent T; Blache JL
Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2743-7. PubMed ID: 18814002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical experience of robot-assisted surgery in gynecologic cancer.
Li XL; Du DF; Jiang H
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Apr; 26(2):119-123. PubMed ID: 27667447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Teaching of total laparoscopic hysterectomy in a gynecological laparoscopy university diploma course].
Morgan Ortiz F; López Zepeda MA
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2011 Sep; 79(9):547-52. PubMed ID: 21966855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
Sendag F; Zeybek B; Akdemir A; Ozgurel B; Oztekin K
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 24376016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Total laparoscopic hysterectomy--indications and complications of 158 patients].
Malinowski A; Makowska J; Antosiak B
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Apr; 84(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 23700856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy?
Beck TL; Morse CB; Gray HJ; Goff BA; Urban RR; Liao JB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):348.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26470825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive surgery in the field of gynecologic oncology.
Kopjar M; Buković D; Zadro M; Fures R; Maricić I
Coll Antropol; 1999 Dec; 23(2):629-32. PubMed ID: 10646238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-port laparoscopic surgery for benign salpingo-ovarian pathology: a single-center experience from Saudi Arabia.
Al-Badawi IA; AlOmar O; Albadawi N; Abu-Zaid A
Ann Saudi Med; 2016; 36(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 26809202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical and oncological outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer.
Moss EL; Balega J; Chan KK; Singh K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 22080890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations.
Wallwiener M; Taran FA; Rothmund R; Kasperkowiak A; Auwärter G; Ganz A; Kraemer B; Abele H; Schönfisch B; Isaacson KB; Brucker SY
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 288(6):1329-39. PubMed ID: 23775263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopy and body mass index: feasibility and outcome in obese patients treated for gynecologic diseases.
Camanni M; Bonino L; Delpiano EM; Migliaretti G; Berchialla P; Deltetto F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 20619751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
