These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27320681)

  • 1. Some axiomatic limitations for consensus and supertree functions on hierarchies.
    McMorris FR; Powers RC
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Sep; 404():342-347. PubMed ID: 27320681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Invariant transformers of Robinson and Foulds distance matrices for Convolutional Neural Network.
    Tahiri N; Veriga A; Koshkarov A; Morozov B
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2022 Aug; 20(4):2250012. PubMed ID: 35798684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Axiomatic opportunities and obstacles for inferring a species tree from gene trees.
    Steel M; Velasco JD
    Syst Biol; 2014 Sep; 63(5):772-8. PubMed ID: 24951558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Split-based computation of majority-rule supertrees.
    Kupczok A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Jul; 11():205. PubMed ID: 21752249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches.
    Baker WJ; Savolainen V; Asmussen-Lange CB; Chase MW; Dransfield J; Forest F; Harley MM; Uhl NW; Wilkinson M
    Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):240-56. PubMed ID: 20525581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. COSPEDTree: COuplet Supertree by Equivalence Partitioning of Taxa Set and DAG Formation.
    Bhattacharyya S; Mukherjee J
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(3):590-603. PubMed ID: 26357270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constructing rooted supertrees using distances.
    Willson SJ
    Bull Math Biol; 2004 Nov; 66(6):1755-83. PubMed ID: 15522354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Majority-rule supertrees.
    Cotton JA; Wilkinson M
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 17558966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.
    Eulenstein O; Chen D; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 15205054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robustness of topological supertree methods for reconciling dense incompatible data.
    Willson SJ
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 19179699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fast computation of supertrees for compatible phylogenies with nested taxa.
    Berry V; Semple C
    Syst Biol; 2006 Apr; 55(2):270-88. PubMed ID: 16611599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robinson-Foulds supertrees.
    Bansal MS; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Feb; 5():18. PubMed ID: 20181274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The shape of supertrees to come: tree shape related properties of fourteen supertree methods.
    Wilkinson M; Cotton JA; Creevey C; Eulenstein O; Harris SR; Lapointe FJ; Levasseur C; McInerney JO; Pisani D; Thorley JL
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 16012108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SuperFine: fast and accurate supertree estimation.
    Swenson MS; Suri R; Linder CR; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 21934137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bad Clade Deletion Supertrees: A Fast and Accurate Supertree Algorithm.
    Fleischauer M; Böcker S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Sep; 34(9):2408-2421. PubMed ID: 28873954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the ancestral compatibility of two phylogenetic trees with nested taxa.
    Llabrés M; Rocha J; Rosselló F; Valiente G
    J Math Biol; 2006 Sep; 53(3):340-64. PubMed ID: 16823581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PhySIC_IST: cleaning source trees to infer more informative supertrees.
    Scornavacca C; Berry V; Lefort V; Douzery EJ; Ranwez V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():413. PubMed ID: 18834542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel versus unsupported clades: assessing the qualitative support for clades in MRP supertrees.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 14668120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative performance of supertree algorithms in large data sets using the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) as a case study.
    Buerki S; Forest F; Salamin N; Alvarez N
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jan; 60(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 21068445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Amalgamating source trees with different taxonomic levels.
    Berry V; Bininda-Emonds OR; Semple C
    Syst Biol; 2013 Mar; 62(2):231-49. PubMed ID: 23179602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.