247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27321698)
1. Efficacy of sublingual misoprostol for induction of labor at term and post term according to parity and membrane integrity: a prospective observational study.
Brusati V; Brembilla G; Cirillo F; Mastricci L; Rossi S; Paganelli AM; Ferrazzi E
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Mar; 30(5):508-513. PubMed ID: 27321698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with that of vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term.
Sheela CN; John C; Preethi R
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(5):469-71. PubMed ID: 25358078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized prospective placebo-controlled study.
Zahran KM; Shahin AY; Abdellah MS; Elsayh KI
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1054-60. PubMed ID: 20144171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial protocol.
Gattás DSMB; da Silva Junior JR; Souza ASR; Feitosa FE; de Amorim MMR
Reprod Health; 2018 Apr; 15(1):65. PubMed ID: 29669596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study.
Schmidt M; Neophytou M; Hars O; Freudenberg J; Kühnert M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30374645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets.
Eriksson A; Jeppesen S; Krebs L
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Feb; 20(1):79. PubMed ID: 32033600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: a randomized prospective study.
Papanikolaou EG; Plachouras N; Drougia A; Andronikou S; Vlachou C; Stefos T; Paraskevaidis E; Zikopoulos K
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2004 Sep; 2():70. PubMed ID: 15450119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Induction of labor with oral misoprostol in nulliparous mothers of twins.
Simões T; Condeço P; Dias E; Ventura P; Matos C; Blickstein I
J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 16519614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sublingual misoprostol compared to artificial rupture of membranes plus oxytocin infusion for labour induction in nulliparous women with a favourable cervix at term.
Lo TK; Lau WL; Wong KS; Tang LC
Hong Kong Med J; 2006 Oct; 12(5):345-50. PubMed ID: 17028353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial.
Gattás DSMB; de Amorim MMR; Feitosa FEL; da Silva-Junior JR; Ribeiro LCG; Souza GFA; Souza ASR
Reprod Health; 2020 Apr; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 32272959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An audit of oral administration of Angusta® (misoprostol) 25 µg for induction of labor in 976 consecutive women with a singleton pregnancy in a university hospital in Denmark.
Helmig RB; Hvidman LE
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Oct; 99(10):1396-1402. PubMed ID: 32311758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oral, vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labor.
Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Nadisauskiene R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Oct; 91(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 16109419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: a randomized control trial.
Cheung PC; Yeo EL; Wong KS; Tang LC
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1128-33. PubMed ID: 16929421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial.
Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R
BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Labor induction by vaginal misoprostol in grand multiparous women.
Bique C; Bugalho A; Bergström S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Mar; 78(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 10078580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
