These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27322693)

  • 21. Factors associated with the risk perception and purchase decisions of Fukushima-related food in South Korea.
    Lee D; Seo S; Song MK; Lee HK; Park S; Jin YW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187655. PubMed ID: 29117237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception of Radiation Risk by Japanese Radiation Specialists Evaluated as a Safe Dose Before the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
    Miura M; Ono K; Yamauchi M; Matsuda N
    Health Phys; 2016 Jun; 110(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 27115222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiation and Regulation in a Post-Fukushima World.
    Macfarlane A
    Health Phys; 2016 Feb; 110(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 26717163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiological protection issues arising during and after the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident.
    González AJ; Akashi M; Boice JD; Chino M; Homma T; Ishigure N; Kai M; Kusumi S; Lee JK; Menzel HG; Niwa O; Sakai K; Weiss W; Yamashita S; Yonekura Y
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Sep; 33(3):497-571. PubMed ID: 23803462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Risk perception of nuclear power plants among university students in Northeast Asia after the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
    Ieong MC; Ho JC; Lee PC; Hokama T; Gima T; Luo L; Sohn M; Kim SY; Kao SF; Hsieh WA; Chang HL; Chang PW
    Asia Pac J Public Health; 2014 Nov; 26(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 24789816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Radiation Exposure and Thyroid Cancer Risk After the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident in Comparison with the Chernobyl Accident.
    Yamashita S; Takamura N; Ohtsuru A; Suzuki S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 27473699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risk Perception and Anxiety Regarding Radiation after the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident: A Systematic Qualitative Review.
    Takebayashi Y; Lyamzina Y; Suzuki Y; Murakami M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Oct; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 29077045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ON JAPANESE PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS (2006-17) ABOUT NUCLEAR AND RADIATION APPLICATIONS.
    Iimoto T; Takashima R; Kimura H; Kawakami K; Endo H; Yasuda H; Nagata N; Sakai N; Kawasaki Y; Funakoshi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Oct; 184(3-4):523-526. PubMed ID: 31172180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Fukushima radiation accident: consequences for radiation accident medical management.
    Meineke V; Dörr H
    Health Phys; 2012 Aug; 103(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 22951483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Public Attitudes toward the Final Disposal of Radioactively Contaminated Soil Resulting from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident.
    Takada M; Murakami M; Ohnuma S; Shibata Y; Yasutaka T
    Environ Manage; 2024 May; 73(5):962-972. PubMed ID: 38305854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of radiation risk perception and knowledge of radiation between Indonesian and Japanese dental students.
    Yoshida M; Yanuaryska RD; Shantiningsih RR; Mudjosemedi M; Honda E
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Aug; 204():104-110. PubMed ID: 31002972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Of Disasters and Dragon Kings: A Statistical Analysis of Nuclear Power Incidents and Accidents.
    Wheatley S; Sovacool B; Sornette D
    Risk Anal; 2017 Jan; 37(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 27002746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MASS MEDIA COMMUNICATION OF EMERGENCY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES IN A NUCLEAR ACCIDENT: FUKUSHIMA REPORTING IN EUROPEAN NEWSPAPERS.
    Gallego E; Cantone MC; Oughton DH; Perko T; Prezelj I; Tomkiv Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 173(1-3):163-169. PubMed ID: 27895097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modeling reconstruction-related behavior and evaluation of influences of major information sources.
    Shirai K; Yoshizawa N; Takebayashi Y; Murakami M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221561. PubMed ID: 31442280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster.
    Visschers VH; Siegrist M
    Risk Anal; 2013 Feb; 33(2):333-47. PubMed ID: 22762151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Knowledge and risk perception of radiation for Japanese nursing students after the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant disaster.
    Yoshida M; Iwamoto S; Okahisa R; Kishida S; Sakama M; Honda E
    Nurse Educ Today; 2020 Nov; 94():104552. PubMed ID: 32805471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Units related to radiation exposure and radioactivity in mass media: the Fukushima case study in Europe and Russia.
    Perko T; Tomkiv Y; Oughton DH; Cantone MC; Gallego E; Prezelj I; Byrkina E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(1-2):154-9. PubMed ID: 25389361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: a review of the environmental impacts.
    Steinhauser G; Brandl A; Johnson TE
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():800-17. PubMed ID: 24189103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Public response to the Tokai nuclear accident.
    Katsuya T
    Risk Anal; 2001 Dec; 21(6):1039-46. PubMed ID: 11824679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Risk communication in construction of new nuclear power plant].
    He GZ; Lü YL
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Mar; 34(3):1218-24. PubMed ID: 23745437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.