These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Contact hypersensitivity to mercury in amalgam restorations may mimic oral lichen planus. Camisa C; Taylor JS; Bernat JR; Helm TN Cutis; 1999 Mar; 63(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 10190076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oral lesions and symptoms related to metals used in dental restorations: a clinical, allergological, and histologic study. Koch P; Bahmer FA J Am Acad Dermatol; 1999 Sep; 41(3 Pt 1):422-30. PubMed ID: 10459117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can We Separate Oral Lichen Planus from Allergic Contact Dermatitis and Should We Patch Test? A Systematic Review of Chronic Oral Lichenoid Lesions. Rahat S; Kashetsky N; Bagit A; Sachdeva M; Lytvyn Y; Mufti A; Maibach HI; Yeung J Dermatitis; 2021 May-Jun 01; 32(3):144-150. PubMed ID: 33273245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A case report of oral lichenoid lesions. Are patch tests necessary? Navarro-TriviƱo FJ; Navarro-Rivero PM; Ruiz-Villaverde R Contact Dermatitis; 2020 Jul; 83(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 32189343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Oral lichenoid lesions, mercury hypersensitivity and combined hypersensitivity to mercury and other metals: histologically-proven reproduction of the reaction by patch testing with metal salts. Koch P; Bahmer FA Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Nov; 33(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 8565487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of patch testing in the management of oral lichenoid reactions. Suter VG; Warnakulasuriya S J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Jan; 45(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 25990286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]