These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27323460)

  • 1. Using laboratory analytics to manage quality assurance and reduce errors in the laboratory.
    Joseph T; Bickley T; Ziagura K
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2016 May; 48(5):38. PubMed ID: 27323460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality Indicators for the Total Testing Process.
    Plebani M; Sciacovelli L; Aita A
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):187-205. PubMed ID: 28153366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carryover: More than just a major hangover for the clinical laboratory.
    Kavsak PA; Zeidler J
    Clin Biochem; 2016 Jul; 49(10-11):735-6. PubMed ID: 27220058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pre-analytical errors: their impact and how to minimize them.
    Kaushik N; Green S
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2014 May; 46(5):22, 24, 26. PubMed ID: 24902378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Teamwork key to reducing lab-results errors.
    Kroft SH
    Mod Healthc; 2014 May; 44(20):25. PubMed ID: 25055465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Launching a Laboratory Testing Process Quality Improvement Toolkit: From the Shared Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP).
    Fernald D; Hamer M; James K; Tutt B; West D
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2015; 28(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 26355129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Laboratory errors – why the laboratory is not (always) to blame].
    Savoca R
    Ther Umsch; 2015 Feb; 72(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 25630293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective tool for risk assessment of sendout testing.
    Cole B; Dickerson JA; Graber ML; Fantz CR; Laposata M; Henriksen K; Astion ML; Epner P
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 Jul; 434():1-5. PubMed ID: 24685573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving consensus on the cause of cytologic-histologic discrepancy: searching for quality assurance methods that work.
    Renshaw AA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Dec; 126(6):831-2. PubMed ID: 17074691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical impact of laboratory critical values notification as a tool for patient safety].
    López-Pelayo I; Fernández-Suárez A; Romero-De-Castilla-y-Gil RJ; Zambrana-García JL
    Med Clin (Barc); 2012 Jul; 139(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 22459577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Database construction for improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
    Grzybicki DM; Turcsanyi B; Becich MJ; Gupta D; Gilbertson JR; Raab SS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 124(4):500-9. PubMed ID: 16146808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic errors due to follow-up system failures.
    Atkinson L
    Iowa Med; 2011; 101(4):23. PubMed ID: 21977624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Making best use of external quality assessment].
    Fried R
    Ther Umsch; 2015 Feb; 72(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25630289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A way to better quality registries: "The profession should demand open comparisons between labs"].
    Silvestri M; Nordling S
    Lakartidningen; 2015 Apr; 112():. PubMed ID: 25898380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Control of electrocardiogram acquisition errors: a brief perspective.
    Rautaharju PM
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):395-7. PubMed ID: 18721646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accountability through regulation in Ontario's Medical Laboratory Sector.
    Gamble B; Bourne L; Deber RB
    Healthc Policy; 2014 Sep; 10(Spec issue):67-78. PubMed ID: 25305390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When diagnostic testing leads to harm: a new outcomes-based approach for laboratory medicine.
    Epner PL; Gans JE; Graber ML
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Oct; 22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii6-ii10. PubMed ID: 23955467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical laboratory improvement amendments waivers.
    Clark JR
    Air Med J; 2013; 32(5):234-5. PubMed ID: 24001908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What are your goals for peer review? A framework for understanding differing methods.
    Fotenos A; Nagy P
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Dec; 9(12):929-30. PubMed ID: 23206652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving electrocardiogram interpretation in the clinical setting.
    Mele P
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):438-9. PubMed ID: 18572183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.