These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27324474)

  • 1. Skin entrance dose with and without lead apron in digital panoramic radiography for selected sensitive body regions.
    Schulze RKW; Cremers C; Karle H; de Las Heras Gala H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1327-1333. PubMed ID: 27324474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of a Commercial Lead Apron on Patient Skin Dose Delivered During Oral and Maxillofacial Examinations under Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
    Schulze RKW; Sazgar M; Karle H; de Las Heras Gala H
    Health Phys; 2017 Aug; 113(2):129-134. PubMed ID: 28658058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
    Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24174012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A leaded apron for use in panoramic dental radiography.
    Whitcher BL; Gratt BM; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 May; 49(5):467-70. PubMed ID: 6929470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the lead apron and collar always reduce radiation dose?
    Nortje CJ; Harris AM; Lackovic KP; Wood RE
    SADJ; 2001 Nov; 56(11):502-4. PubMed ID: 11885424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation dose to the thyroid gland and breast from multidetector computed tomography of the cervical spine: does bismuth shielding with and without a cervical collar reduce dose?
    Gunn ML; Kanal KM; Kolokythas O; Anzai Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):987-90. PubMed ID: 19940673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shielding effect of thyroid collar for digital panoramic radiography.
    Han GS; Cheng JG; Li G; Ma XC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130265. PubMed ID: 24005060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of dose-area product from panoramic radiography using a pencil ionization chamber: normalized data for the estimation of patient effective and organ doses.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Neratzoulakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):708-14. PubMed ID: 15124987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation exposure to foetus and breasts from dental X-ray examinations: effect of lead shields.
    Kelaranta A; Ekholm M; Toroi P; Kortesniemi M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150095. PubMed ID: 26313308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency of the cervical lead shield during intraoral radiography.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Shlezinger T; Segal P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Dec; 62(6):732-6. PubMed ID: 3467297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation exposure to critical organs in panoramic dental examination.
    Bahreyni Toossi MT; Akbari F; Bayani Roodi S
    Acta Med Iran; 2012; 50(12):809-13. PubMed ID: 23456522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The efficacy of lead shielding in patient dosage reduction in computed tomography].
    Hidajat N; Schröder RJ; Vogl T; Schedel H; Felix R
    Rofo; 1996 Nov; 165(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 8998318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usefulness of a lead shielding device for reducing the radiation dose to tissues outside the primary beams during CT.
    Chung JJ; Cho ES; Kang SM; Yu JS; Kim DJ; Kim JH
    Radiol Med; 2014 Dec; 119(12):951-957. PubMed ID: 24903707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the radiation dose in the thyroid gland using different protective collars in panoramic imaging.
    Hafezi L; Arianezhad SM; Hosseini Pooya SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jul; 47(6):20170428. PubMed ID: 29658781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose.
    Yilmaz MH; Albayram S; Yaşar D; Ozer H; Adaletli I; Selçuk D; Akman C; Altuğ A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 17259846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo simulations of occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology.
    Siiskonen T; Tapiovaara M; Kosunen A; Lehtinen M; Vartiainen E
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 80(954):460-8. PubMed ID: 17151067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thyroid dose during neurointerventional procedures: does lead shielding reduce the dose?
    Shortt CP; Fanning NF; Malone L; Thornton J; Brennan P; Lee MJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(5):922-7. PubMed ID: 17533529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing radiation doses to the breast, thyroid and gonads during diagnostic radiography. Part 2. Measurement of doses to the gonads during radiography of the pelvis.
    Weatherburn GC
    Radiography; 1983 Aug; 49(584):195-202. PubMed ID: 6622661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.