These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27324526)
21. Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy. Sarkaria IS; Rizk NP; Goldman DA; Sima C; Tan KS; Bains MS; Adusumilli PS; Molena D; Bott M; Atkinson T; Jones DR; Rusch VW Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Sep; 108(3):920-928. PubMed ID: 31026433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Meta-analysis of Jejunostomy Versus Nasoenteral Tube for Enteral Nutrition Following Esophagectomy. Li HN; Chen Y; Dai L; Wang YY; Chen MW; Mei LX J Surg Res; 2021 Aug; 264():553-561. PubMed ID: 33864963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Early experience and lessons learned in a new minimally invasive esophagectomy program. Mungo B; Lidor AO; Stem M; Molena D Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1692-8. PubMed ID: 26123339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of acute intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Freeman RK; Vyverberg A; Ascioti AJ Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Jul; 92(1):204-8; discussion 208. PubMed ID: 21549349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intrathoracic versus Cervical ANastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: study protocol of the ICAN randomized controlled trial. van Workum F; Bouwense SA; Luyer MD; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van der Peet DL; Daams F; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; Gisbertz SS; Henegouwen MI; Heisterkamp J; Langenhoff BS; Martijnse IS; Grutters JP; Klarenbeek BR; Rovers MM; Rosman C Trials; 2016 Oct; 17(1):505. PubMed ID: 27756419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience. Dunn DH; Johnson EM; Morphew JA; Dilworth HP; Krueger JL; Banerji N Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 22394116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy]. Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of a fast-track surgery protocol on patients undergoing minimally invasive oesophagectomy: preliminary results. Pan H; Hu X; Yu Z; Zhang R; Zhang W; Ge J Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Sep; 19(3):441-7. PubMed ID: 24916581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Early postoperative endoscopy for targeted management of patients at risks of anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Nishikawa K; Fujita T; Yuda M; Yamamoto S; Tanaka Y; Matsumoto A; Tanishima Y; Yano F; Mitsumori N; Yanaga K Surgery; 2016 Nov; 160(5):1294-1301. PubMed ID: 27521045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open. Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy. Tomaszek SC; Cassivi SD; Allen MS; Shen KR; Nichols FC; Deschamps C; Wigle DA Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Apr; 37(4):807-13. PubMed ID: 19900819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer. Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of "Nil by Mouth" Versus Early Oral Intake in Three Different Diet Regimens Following Esophagectomy. Eberhard KE; Achiam MP; Rolff HC; Belmouhand M; Svendsen LB; Thorsteinsson M World J Surg; 2017 Jun; 41(6):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 28078353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Improved Functional Results After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Intrathoracic Versus Cervical Anastomosis. van Workum F; van der Maas J; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Luyer MD; Rosman C Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 103(1):267-273. PubMed ID: 27677565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of Esophageal Anastomotic Integrity With Serial Pleural Amylase Levels. Miller DL; Helms GA; Mayfield WR Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Jan; 105(1):200-206. PubMed ID: 29191359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of Early vs Late Start of Oral Intake on Anastomotic Leakage Following Elective Lower Intestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review. Smeets BJJ; Peters EG; Horsten ECJ; Weijs TJ; Rutten HJT; Buurman WA; de Jonge WJ; Luyer MDP Nutr Clin Pract; 2018 Dec; 33(6):803-812. PubMed ID: 28628353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Delay in Oral Feeding is Associated With a Decrease in Anastomotic Leak Following Transhiatal Esophagectomy. Speicher JE; Gunn TM; Rossi NP; Iannettoni MD Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Winter; 30(4):476-484. PubMed ID: 30189260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcomes after totally minimally invasive versus hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: results from the International Esodata Study Group. van der Wilk BJ; Hagens ERC; Eyck BM; Gisbertz SS; van Hillegersberg R; Nafteux P; Schröder W; Nilsson M; Wijnhoven BPL; Lagarde SM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Br J Surg; 2022 Feb; 109(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 35024794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]