207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27325335)
1. The Cost-Effectiveness of Bevacizumab in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Using Evidence from the ICON7 Trial.
Hinde S; Epstein D; Cook A; Embleton A; Perren T; Sculpher M
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 27325335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. First- and second-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A Belgian cost-utility analysis.
Neyt M; Vlayen J; Devriese S; Camberlin C
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195134. PubMed ID: 29630612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab to first line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Mehta DA; Hay JW
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):677-83. PubMed ID: 24463160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost effectiveness of alternative strategies for incorporating bevacizumab into the primary treatment of ovarian cancer.
Barnett JC; Alvarez Secord A; Cohn DE; Leath CA; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ
Cancer; 2013 Oct; 119(20):3653-61. PubMed ID: 23921967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. At what cost does a potential survival advantage of bevacizumab make sense for the primary treatment of ovarian cancer? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cohn DE; Kim KH; Resnick KE; O'Malley DM; Straughn JM
J Clin Oncol; 2011 Apr; 29(10):1247-51. PubMed ID: 21383297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adding bevacizumab to single agent chemotherapy for the treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: A cost effectiveness analysis of the AURELIA trial.
Wysham WZ; Schaffer EM; Coles T; Roque DR; Wheeler SB; Kim KH
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 May; 145(2):340-345. PubMed ID: 28291545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of combination versus sequential docetaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.
Havrilesky LJ; Pokrzywinski R; Revicki D; Higgins RV; Nycum LR; Kohler MF; Berchuck A; Myers ER; Secord AA
Cancer; 2012 Jan; 118(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 21598242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Combination Therapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.
Criss SD; Mooradian MJ; Watson TR; Gainor JF; Reynolds KL; Kong CY
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911952. PubMed ID: 31553470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bevacizumab in treatment of high-risk ovarian cancer--a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Chan JK; Herzog TJ; Hu L; Monk BJ; Kiet T; Blansit K; Kapp DS; Yu X
Oncologist; 2014 May; 19(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 24721817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ASCO Value Framework Highlights the Relative Value of Treatment Options in Ovarian Cancer.
Foote J; Secord AA; Liang M; Cohn DE; Jewell E; Havrilesky LJ
J Oncol Pract; 2017 Dec; 13(12):e1030-e1039. PubMed ID: 29016225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A trial-based assessment of the cost-utility of bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Goulart B; Ramsey S
Value Health; 2011; 14(6):836-45. PubMed ID: 21914503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-Effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Olaparib Maintenance Therapy Versus No Maintenance Therapy After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced BRCA1/2-mutated Ovarian Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.
Armeni P; Borsoi L; Fornaro G; Jommi C; Colombo N; Costa F
Clin Ther; 2020 Jul; 42(7):1192-1209.e12. PubMed ID: 32591103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From randomised clinical trials to clinical practice : a pragmatic cost-effectiveness analysis of Paclitaxel in first-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer.
Limat S; Woronoff-Lemsi MC; Menat C; Madroszyk-Flandin A; Merrouche Y
Pharmacoeconomics; 2004; 22(10):633-41. PubMed ID: 15244489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost Effectiveness of Chemotherapeutic Agents and Targeted Biologics in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Poonawalla IB; Parikh RC; Du XL; VonVille HM; Lairson DR
Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1155-85. PubMed ID: 26072142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences of Chemotherapies and Targeted Biologics for Elderly Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Parikh RC; Du XL; Robert MO; Lairson DR
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 28025930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cost-benefit analysis of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Montero AJ; Avancha K; Glück S; Lopes G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(2):747-51. PubMed ID: 22200867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is FDA-Approved Bevacizumab Cost-Effective When Included in the Treatment of Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer?
Chappell NP; Miller CR; Fielden AD; Barnett JC
J Oncol Pract; 2016 Jul; 12(7):e775-83. PubMed ID: 27246689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel versus intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy for Stage III ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Bristow RE; Santillan A; Salani R; Diaz-Montes TP; Giuntoli RL; Meisner BC; Armstrong DK; Frick KD
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Sep; 106(3):476-81. PubMed ID: 17688927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Paclitaxel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of ovarian cancer.
Young M; Plosker GL
Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19(12):1227-59. PubMed ID: 11772158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First-line atezolizumab in addition to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wan X; Luo X; Tan C; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Peng L
Cancer; 2019 Oct; 125(20):3526-3534. PubMed ID: 31287562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
