584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27325340)
1. Does the Introduction of the Ranking Task in Valuation Studies Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inconsistencies? The Case of the EQ-5D-5L.
Ramos-Goñi JM; Rand-Hendriksen K; Pinto-Prades JL
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 27325340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study.
Ludwig K; von der Schulenburg JG; Greiner W
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Feb; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 28219389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time trade-off and ranking exercises are sensitive to different dimensions of EQ-5D health states.
Rand-Hendriksen K; Augestad LA
Value Health; 2012; 15(5):777-82. PubMed ID: 22867789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values?
Mulhern B; Shah K; Janssen MF; Longworth L; Ibbotson R
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 27021755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Techniques: The Composite Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
Purba FD; Hunfeld JAM; Timman R; Iskandarsyah A; Fitriana TS; Sadarjoen SS; Passchier J; Busschbach JJV
Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1243-1249. PubMed ID: 30314626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Health States: The Impact of Wording and Perspective.
Kreimeier S; Oppe M; Ramos-Goñi JM; Cole A; Devlin N; Herdman M; Mulhern B; Shah KK; Stolk E; Rivero-Arias O; Greiner W
Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1291-1298. PubMed ID: 30442276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Handling Data Quality Issues to Estimate the Spanish EQ-5D-5L Value Set Using a Hybrid Interval Regression Approach.
Ramos-Goñi JM; Craig BM; Oppe M; Ramallo-Fariña Y; Pinto-Prades JL; Luo N; Rivero-Arias O
Value Health; 2018 May; 21(5):596-604. PubMed ID: 29753358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report.
Mulhern B; Bansback N; Brazier J; Buckingham K; Cairns J; Devlin N; Dolan P; Hole AR; Kavetsos G; Longworth L; Rowen D; Tsuchiya A
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(12):vii-xxvi, 1-191. PubMed ID: 24568945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Igarashi A; Fukuda T; Saito S; Shimozuma K
Value Health; 2016; 19(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 27565282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol.
Oppe M; Devlin NJ; van Hout B; Krabbe PF; de Charro F
Value Health; 2014 Jun; 17(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24969006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inconsistencies in TTO and VAS values for EQ-5D health states.
Lamers LM; Stalmeier PF; Krabbe PF; Busschbach JJ
Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 16525171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off.
Jiang R; Shaw J; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS
Qual Life Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1433-1444. PubMed ID: 33247810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality Control Process for EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies.
Ramos-Goñi JM; Oppe M; Slaap B; Busschbach JJ; Stolk E
Value Health; 2017 Mar; 20(3):466-473. PubMed ID: 28292492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Logical inconsistencies in time trade-off valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states: Whose fault is it?
Yang Z; van Busschbach J; Timman R; Janssen MF; Luo N
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184883. PubMed ID: 28934266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.
Sayah FA; Bansback N; Bryan S; Ohinmaa A; Poissant L; Pullenayegum E; Xie F; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1679-85. PubMed ID: 26659899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the Use of a Feedback Module to Model EQ-5D-5L Health States Values in Hong Kong.
Wong ELY; Ramos-Goñi JM; Cheung AWL; Wong AYK; Rivero-Arias O
Patient; 2018 Apr; 11(2):235-247. PubMed ID: 29019161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol.
Stolk E; Ludwig K; Rand K; van Hout B; Ramos-Goñi JM
Value Health; 2019 Jan; 22(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30661630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China.
Luo N; Liu G; Li M; Guan H; Jin X; Rand-Hendriksen K
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):662-669. PubMed ID: 28408009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
