BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27325343)

  • 1. Efficient Value of Information Calculation Using a Nonparametric Regression Approach: An Applied Perspective.
    Tuffaha HW; Strong M; Gordon LG; Scuffham PA
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):505-9. PubMed ID: 27325343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Efficient Method for Computing Expected Value of Sample Information for Survival Data from an Ongoing Trial.
    Vervaart M; Strong M; Claxton KP; Welton NJ; Wisløff T; Aas E
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Jul; 42(5):612-625. PubMed ID: 34967237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Need for speed: an efficient algorithm for calculation of single-parameter expected value of partial perfect information.
    Sadatsafavi M; Bansback N; Zafari Z; Najafzadeh M; Marra C
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):438-48. PubMed ID: 23538197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Review of Methods for Analysis of the Expected Value of Information.
    Heath A; Manolopoulou I; Baio G
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Oct; 37(7):747-758. PubMed ID: 28410564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calculating Expected Value of Sample Information Adjusting for Imperfect Implementation.
    Heath A
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Jul; 42(5):626-636. PubMed ID: 35034542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo Methods for the Calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information.
    Fang W; Wang Z; Giles MB; Jackson CH; Welton NJ; Andrieu C; Thom H
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):168-181. PubMed ID: 34231446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient Monte Carlo Estimation of the Expected Value of Sample Information Using Moment Matching.
    Heath A; Manolopoulou I; Baio G
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Feb; 38(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 29126364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the Expected Value of Sample Information Using the Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Sample: A Fast, Nonparametric Regression-Based Method.
    Strong M; Oakley JE; Brennan A; Breeze P
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jul; 35(5):570-83. PubMed ID: 25810269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information Using Efficient Nested Monte Carlo: A Tutorial.
    Heath A; Baio G
    Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1299-1304. PubMed ID: 30442277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. General-Purpose Methods for Simulating Survival Data for Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations.
    Vervaart M; Aas E; Claxton KP; Strong M; Welton NJ; Wisløff T; Heath A
    Med Decis Making; 2023 Jul; 43(5):595-609. PubMed ID: 36971425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating multiparameter partial expected value of perfect information from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis sample: a nonparametric regression approach.
    Strong M; Oakley JE; Brennan A
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Apr; 34(3):311-26. PubMed ID: 24246566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementing Generalized Additive Models to Estimate the Expected Value of Sample Information in a Microsimulation Model: Results of Three Case Studies.
    Rabideau DJ; Pei PP; Walensky RP; Zheng A; Parker RA
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Feb; 38(2):189-199. PubMed ID: 29117791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Efficient Estimator for the Expected Value of Sample Information.
    Menzies NA
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Apr; 36(3):308-20. PubMed ID: 25911600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the expected value of partial perfect information in health economic evaluations using integrated nested Laplace approximation.
    Heath A; Manolopoulou I; Baio G
    Stat Med; 2016 Oct; 35(23):4264-80. PubMed ID: 27189534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information in Practice: Considerations from 3 Case Studies.
    Heath A; Kunst N; Jackson C; Strong M; Alarid-Escudero F; Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Baio G; Menzies NA; Jalal H
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Apr; 40(3):314-326. PubMed ID: 32297840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-Effectiveness Uncertainty Analysis Methods: A Comparison of One-Way Sensitivity, Analysis of Covariance, and Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information.
    Campbell JD; McQueen RB; Libby AM; Spackman DE; Carlson JJ; Briggs A
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jul; 35(5):596-607. PubMed ID: 25349188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When is enough evidence enough? - Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence.
    Siebert U; Rochau U; Claxton K
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):575-84. PubMed ID: 24315327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of value of information in UK health technology assessments.
    Mohiuddin S; Fenwick E; Payne K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Dec; 30(6):553-70. PubMed ID: 25816821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value of Information Analytical Methods: Report 2 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force.
    Rothery C; Strong M; Koffijberg HE; Basu A; Ghabri S; Knies S; Murray JF; Sanders Schmidler GD; Steuten L; Fenwick E
    Value Health; 2020 Mar; 23(3):277-286. PubMed ID: 32197720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.