84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2732553)
1. [In vitro hemodynamic characteristics of prosthetic heart valves].
Shimada R
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jan; 37(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 2732553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [In vitro hydrodynamic characteristics of heart valves in tricuspid position].
Yamada T
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Jul; 38(7):1176-82. PubMed ID: 2212780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].
Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E
G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position].
Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C
Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the new mechanical bileaflet Sorin Bicarbon valve prosthesis compared with St. Jude Medical].
Badano L; Carratino L; De Gaetano G; Piazza R; Calisi P; Passerone G; Lucatti A
G Ital Cardiol; 1994 Jun; 24(6):733-43. PubMed ID: 8088472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Continuous wave Doppler assessment of prosthetic valves in the mitral position: comparison of the St. Jude medical mechanical valve and the porcine xenograft valve].
Kisanuki A; Tei C; Arikawa K; Natsugoe K; Otsuji Y; Kawazoe Y; Tanaka H; Morishita Y; Maruko M; Taira A
J Cardiogr; 1985 Dec; 15(4):1119-27. PubMed ID: 3841894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A database obtained from in vitro function testing of mechanical heart valves.
Walker DK; Scotten LN
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Sep; 3(5):561-70. PubMed ID: 8000593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [In vitro evaluation of hydrodynamics of prosthetic heart valves].
Okude J
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Nov; 89(11):1893-902. PubMed ID: 3205255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves.
Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Gill CC; Golding LA; Stewart RW; Loop FD; Williams GW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Mar; 89(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 3974271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro assessment of prosthetic valve function in mitral valve replacement with chordal preservation techniques.
Fontaine AA; He S; Stadter R; Ellis JT; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Mar; 5(2):186-98. PubMed ID: 8665014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus.
Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Guenzinger R; Wagner IM; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(12):2054-60. PubMed ID: 15963409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in vivo.
Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Williams GW
Circulation; 1985 Sep; 72(3 Pt 2):II146-52. PubMed ID: 4028359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Historical evolution of prosthetic heart valves].
Tamames Escobar S
An R Acad Nac Med (Madr); 2006; 123(3):495-523; discussion 523-4. PubMed ID: 17451095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Rest and exercise performance of allografts, Bicer valves and St. Jude Medical valves in the aortic position].
Hasegawa J; Kitamura S; Kawachi K; Kawata T; Niwaya K; Kameda Y; Mizuguchi K; Kobayashi S; Yoshida Y
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Aug; 43(8):1132-7. PubMed ID: 7594847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Hemodynamic assessment of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve compared with the St. Jude Medical valve in the aortic position using dobutamine-stress echocardiography].
Oda T; Fukunaga S; Arinaga K; Kawano H; Chihara S; Yokose S; Onitsuka S; Sakashita H; Aoyagi S
Kyobu Geka; 2000 Apr; 53(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 10770062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
