These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27327063)
1. Political Microtargeting: Relationship Between Personalized Advertising on Facebook and Voters' Responses. Kruikemeier S; Sezgin M; Boerman SC Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2016 Jun; 19(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 27327063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying the potential persuasive returns to political microtargeting. Tappin BM; Wittenberg C; Hewitt LB; Berinsky AJ; Rand DG Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jun; 120(25):e2216261120. PubMed ID: 37307486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Touching the base: heart-warming ads from the 2016 U.S. election moved viewers to partisan tears. Seibt B; Schubert TW; Zickfeld JH; Fiske AP Cogn Emot; 2019 Mar; 33(2):197-212. PubMed ID: 29510656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Personalizing politics: a congruency model of political preference. Caprara GV; Zimbardo PG Am Psychol; 2004 Oct; 59(7):581-94. PubMed ID: 15491254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Emotional Campaigning in Politics: Being Moved and Anger in Political Ads Motivate to Support Candidate and Party. GrĂ¼ning DJ; Schubert TW Front Psychol; 2021; 12():781851. PubMed ID: 35095666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The unintended consequences of disclosure: effect of manipulating sponsor identification on the perceived credibility and effectiveness of smoking cessation advertisements. Byrne S; Guillory JE; Mathios AD; Avery RJ; Hart PS J Health Commun; 2012; 17(10):1119-37. PubMed ID: 23057726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of mood and information processing strategies on recall, persuasion, and intention to get a flu vaccine. Sar S; Rodriguez L Health Mark Q; 2019; 36(1):17-34. PubMed ID: 30849027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Emotional expressions in antismoking television advertisements: consequences of anger and sadness framing on pathways to persuasion. Kim SJ; Niederdeppe J J Health Commun; 2014; 19(6):692-709. PubMed ID: 24417482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Persuading drivers to refrain from speeding: Effects of message sidedness and regulatory fit. Pierro A; Giacomantonio M; Pica G; Giannini AM; Kruglanski AW; Higgins ET Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():917-25. PubMed ID: 22882878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. This is Advertising! Effects of Disclosing Television Brand Placement on Adolescents. van Reijmersdal EA; Boerman SC; Buijzen M; Rozendaal E J Youth Adolesc; 2017 Feb; 46(2):328-342. PubMed ID: 27165259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How Does Health-Related Advertising with a Regulatory Focus and Goal Framing Affect Attitudes toward Ads and Healthy Behavior Intentions? Lin CY; Yeh WJ Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Dec; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 29207544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Persuasive Language in ELT-Related Ads on Social Media. Morady Moghaddam M; Esmaeilpour F J Psycholinguist Res; 2023 Aug; 52(4):1263-1288. PubMed ID: 36853477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors and the role of attitude toward the message and perceived message quality in gain- and loss-frame antidrug persuasion of adolescents. Cho H; Choi J Health Commun; 2010 Jun; 25(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 20512712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Message sidedness in advertising: the moderating roles of need for cognition and time pressure in persuasion. Kao DT Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 21752025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Industry sponsored anti-smoking ads and adolescent reactance: test of a boomerang effect. Henriksen L; Dauphinee AL; Wang Y; Fortmann SP Tob Control; 2006 Feb; 15(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 16436398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Designing and evaluating a persuasive child restraint television commercial. Lewis I; Ho B; Lennon A Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 26207520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The persuasive effects of political microtargeting in the age of generative artificial intelligence. Simchon A; Edwards M; Lewandowsky S PNAS Nexus; 2024 Feb; 3(2):pgae035. PubMed ID: 38328785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the persuasive influence of political microtargeting with large language models. Hackenburg K; Margetts H Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Jun; 121(24):e2403116121. PubMed ID: 38848300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliance on Facebook for news and its influence on political engagement. David CC; San Pascual MRS; Torres MES PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212263. PubMed ID: 30889186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stressful politics: voters' cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential election. Stanton SJ; Labar KS; Saini EK; Kuhn CM; Beehner JC Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2010 Jun; 35(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 19962831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]