283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27327165)
1. The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members.
Hunt M; Tansey CM; Anderson J; Boulanger RF; Eckenwiler L; Pringle J; Schwartz L
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157142. PubMed ID: 27327165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research.
Tansey CM; Anderson J; Boulanger RF; Eckenwiler L; Pringle J; Schwartz L; Hunt M
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 28659166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Real-time Responsiveness for Ethics Oversight During Disaster Research.
Eckenwiler L; Pringle J; Boulanger R; Hunt M
Bioethics; 2015 Nov; 29(9):653-61. PubMed ID: 26481207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Case-Study of the Resources and Functioning of Two Research Ethics Committees in Western India.
Chenneville T; Menezes L; Kosambiya J; Baxi R
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Dec; 11(5):387-396. PubMed ID: 26994735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small is beautiful: demystifying and simplifying standard operating procedures: a model from the ethics review and consultancy committee of the Cameroon Bioethics Initiative.
Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer O; Munung NS; Tangwa GB
BMC Med Ethics; 2016 May; 17(1):27. PubMed ID: 27178053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Training needs assessment in research ethics evaluation among research ethics committee members in three African countries: Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania.
Ateudjieu J; Williams J; Hirtle M; Baume C; Ikingura J; Niaré A; Sprumont D
Dev World Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 19912281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries.
Silverman H; Sleem H; Moodley K; Kumar N; Naidoo S; Subramanian T; Jaafar R; Moni M
J Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 41(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 24748650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Research Ethics Committees (RECs) and epidemic response in low and middle income countries.
Bain LE; Ngwain CG; Nwobegahay J; Sumboh JG; Nditanchou R; Awah PK
Pan Afr Med J; 2018; 31():209. PubMed ID: 31447968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Governance frameworks for COVID-19 research ethics review and oversight in Latin America: an exploratory study.
Palmero A; Carracedo S; Cabrera N; Bianchini A
BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):147. PubMed ID: 34742278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees.
Burgess T; Rennie S; Moodley K
BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Feb; 24(1):11. PubMed ID: 36793067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical research ethics review process in Lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees - results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study.
Atallah D; Moubarak M; El Kassis N; Abboud S
Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):27. PubMed ID: 29325585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Research in disaster settings: a systematic qualitative review of ethical guidelines.
Mezinska S; Kakuk P; Mijaljica G; Waligóra M; O'Mathúna DP
BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 27769232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Addressing the challenge for expedient ethical review of research in disasters and disease outbreaks.
Aarons D
Bioethics; 2019 Mar; 33(3):343-346. PubMed ID: 30511771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Description and Evaluation of the Research Ethics Review Process in Japan: Proposed Measures for Improvement.
Suzuki M; Sato K
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):256-66. PubMed ID: 27534589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
Klitzman R
Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying structures, processes, resources and needs of research ethics committees in Egypt.
Sleem H; El-Kamary SS; Silverman HJ
BMC Med Ethics; 2010 Jun; 11():12. PubMed ID: 20584332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Call for Better, Not Faster, Research Ethics Committee Reviews in the Covid-19 Era.
Tamariz L; Hendler FJ; Wells JM; Anderson A; Bartlett S
Ethics Hum Res; 2021 Sep; 43(5):42-44. PubMed ID: 34496160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Challenges of Big Data for Research Ethics Committees: A Qualitative Swiss Study.
Ferretti A; Ienca M; Velarde MR; Hurst S; Vayena E
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2022; 17(1-2):129-143. PubMed ID: 34779661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Research ethics committees and post-approval activities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of European research ethics committee representatives.
Cox S; Solbakk JH; Bernabe RDLC
Curr Med Res Opin; 2022 Nov; 38(11):1897-1907. PubMed ID: 35993742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Professional and academic profile of the Brazilian research ethics committees.
de Veras Santos EP; Guerriero ICZ
BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):109. PubMed ID: 36368994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
