These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27327583)

  • 21. Bilateral symmetry in vision and influence of ocular surgical procedures on binocular vision: A topical review.
    Arba Mosquera S; Verma S
    J Optom; 2016; 9(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 26995709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Relationship Between Visual Acuity and the Reproducibility of Visual Field Measurements in Glaucoma Patients.
    Matsuura M; Hirasawa K; Murata H; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 56(9):5630-5. PubMed ID: 26313298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dominance wave propagation during binocular rivalry in mild glaucoma.
    Tarita-Nistor L; Samet S; Trope GE; González EG
    Vision Res; 2019 Dec; 165():64-71. PubMed ID: 31678616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eye dominance in binocular viewing conditions.
    Johansson J; Seimyr GÖ; Pansell T
    J Vis; 2015; 15(9):21. PubMed ID: 26230983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dichoptic stimulation improves detection of glaucoma with multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Arvind H; Klistorner A; Graham S; Grigg J; Goldberg I; Klistorner A; Billson FA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4590-6. PubMed ID: 17898282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Variability in monocular and binocular fixation during standard automated perimetry.
    Hirasawa K; Kobayashi K; Shibamoto A; Tobari H; Fukuda Y; Shoji N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207517. PubMed ID: 30462706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of contrast on monocular versus binocular reading performance.
    Johansson J; Pansell T; Ygge J; Seimyr GÖ
    J Vis; 2014 May; 14(5):8. PubMed ID: 24829225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of binocular summation in the peripheral visual field in young and older patients.
    Pardhan S
    Curr Eye Res; 1997 Mar; 16(3):252-5. PubMed ID: 9088742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry and Changes in Quality of Life of Glaucoma Patients: A Longitudinal Study.
    Abe RY; Gracitelli CP; Diniz-Filho A; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Medeiros FA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 160(1):114-122.e1. PubMed ID: 25868760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How Many Visual Fields Are Required to Precisely Predict Future Test Results in Glaucoma Patients When Using Different Trend Analyses?
    Taketani Y; Murata H; Fujino Y; Mayama C; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 56(6):4076-82. PubMed ID: 26114484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Impact of Monocular and Integrated Binocular Visual Fields on Vision-related Quality of Life.
    Chun YS; Lee DI; Kwon J; Park IK
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):283-291. PubMed ID: 28079653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of rates of change between binocular and monocular visual fields.
    Chun YS; Shin JH; Park IK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jan; 56(1):451-7. PubMed ID: 25564449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The functional consequences of glaucoma for eye-hand coordination.
    Kotecha A; O'Leary N; Melmoth D; Grant S; Crabb DP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jan; 50(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 18806294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Integrated visual fields: a new approach to measuring the binocular field of view and visual disability.
    Crabb DP; Viswanathan AC
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 243(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 15806374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma.
    Crabb DP; Viswanathan AC; McNaught AI; Poinoosawmy D; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1998 Nov; 82(11):1236-41. PubMed ID: 9924324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of ocular dominance on visual field testing.
    Spry PG; Furber JE; Harrad RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 79(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11871400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Absence of binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning effects in color discrimination.
    Costa MF; Ventura DF; Perazzolo F; Murakoshi M; Silveira LC
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):461-9. PubMed ID: 16961981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Comparison between binocular and monocular reading ability and its relation with central visual field sensitivity in glaucoma patients].
    Ishii M; Seki M; Harigai R; Abe H; Fukuchi T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Nov; 117(11):925-30. PubMed ID: 24397190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of ocular dominance and visual input on body sway.
    Asakawa K; Ishikawa H; Kawamorita T; Fujiyama Y; Shoji N; Uozato H
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2007; 51(5):375-378. PubMed ID: 17926115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensory ocular dominance based on resolution acuity, contrast sensitivity and alignment sensitivity.
    Suttle C; Alexander J; Liu M; Ng S; Poon J; Tran T
    Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Jan; 92(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 18691218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.