These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Robotic Technology Produces More Conservative Tibial Resection Than Conventional Techniques in UKA. Ponzio DY; Lonner JH Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2016; 45(7):E465-E468. PubMed ID: 28005115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The learning curve associated with robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Kayani B; Konan S; Pietrzak JRT; Huq SS; Tahmassebi J; Haddad FS Bone Joint J; 2018 Aug; 100-B(8):1033-1042. PubMed ID: 30062950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: prosthesis design and type should be reported. Robinson PG; Clement ND; Hamilton D; Blyth MJG; Haddad FS; Patton JT Bone Joint J; 2019 Jul; 101-B(7):838-847. PubMed ID: 31256672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant orientation accuracy of a hand-held robotic partial knee replacement system over conventional technique in a cadaveric test. Khare R; Jaramaz B; Hamlin B; Urish KL Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2018 Dec; 23(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 29932791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved sizing with image-based robotic-assisted system compared to image-free and conventional techniques in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Batailler C; Bordes M; Lording T; Nigues A; Servien E; Calliess T; Lustig S Bone Joint J; 2021 Apr; 103-B(4):610-618. PubMed ID: 33789484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved accuracy and reproducibility of a novel CT-free robotic surgical assistant for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study. Lonner JH; Seidenstein AD; Charters MA; North WT; Cafferky NL; Durbhakula SM; Kamath AF Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Aug; 30(8):2759-2767. PubMed ID: 34120210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and rationale for robotic arm-assisted technology. Lonner JH Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Feb; 38(2 Suppl):3-6. PubMed ID: 19340375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is robotic technology more accurate than conventional technique? Citak M; Suero EM; Citak M; Dunbar NJ; Branch SH; Conditt MA; Banks SA; Pearle AD Knee; 2013 Aug; 20(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 23201147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Data from a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study. Bell SW; Anthony I; Jones B; MacLean A; Rowe P; Blyth M J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 98(8):627-35. PubMed ID: 27098321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty: An Overview. van der List JP; Chawla H; Pearle AD Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2016; 45(4):202-11. PubMed ID: 27327911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A systematic review of MAKO-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Lin J; Yan S; Ye Z; Zhao X Int J Med Robot; 2020 Oct; 16(5):1-7. PubMed ID: 32445224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the MAKO experience. Roche M Orthop Clin North Am; 2015 Jan; 46(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 25435041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]