146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27328116)
1. Comparison of Two Different Methods Used for Semen Evaluation: Analysis of Semen Samples from 1,055 Men.
Dinçer M; Kucukdurmaz F; Salabas E; Ortac M; Aktan G; Kadioglu A
Urol Int; 2017; 98(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 27328116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Body mass index in relation to semen quality and reproductive hormones in New Zealand men: a cross-sectional study in fertility clinics.
Macdonald AA; Stewart AW; Farquhar CM
Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3178-87. PubMed ID: 24129611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cigarette Smoking and Semen Quality: A New Meta-analysis Examining the Effect of the 2010 World Health Organization Laboratory Methods for the Examination of Human Semen.
Sharma R; Harlev A; Agarwal A; Esteves SC
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):635-645. PubMed ID: 27113031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Manual vs. computer-assisted sperm analysis: can CASA replace manual assessment of human semen in clinical practice?
Talarczyk-Desole J; Berger A; Taszarek-Hauke G; Hauke J; Pawelczyk L; Jedrzejczak P
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 28326513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uncertainty associated with assessing semen volume: are volumetric and gravimetric methods that different?
Woodward B; Gossen N; Meadows J; Tomlinson M
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2016 Dec; 19(4):249-253. PubMed ID: 27636590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tobacco smoking is associated with decreased semen quality.
Asare-Anane H; Bannison SB; Ofori EK; Ateko RO; Bawah AT; Amanquah SD; Oppong SY; Gandau BB; Ziem JB
Reprod Health; 2016 Aug; 13(1):90. PubMed ID: 27496053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a specific method to evaluate 8-hydroxy, 2-deoxyguanosine in sperm nuclei: relationship with semen quality in a cohort of 94 subjects.
Cambi M; Tamburrino L; Marchiani S; Olivito B; Azzari C; Forti G; Baldi E; Muratori M
Reproduction; 2013 Mar; 145(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 23457372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testicular function in a birth cohort of young men.
Hart RJ; Doherty DA; McLachlan RI; Walls ML; Keelan JA; Dickinson JE; Skakkebaek NE; Norman RJ; Handelsman DJ
Hum Reprod; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2713-24. PubMed ID: 26409015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system.
Hamilton JA; Cissen M; Brandes M; Smeenk JM; de Bruin JP; Kremer JA; Nelen WL; Hamilton CJ
Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1110-21. PubMed ID: 25788568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased levels of sperm ubiquitin correlate with semen quality in men from an andrology laboratory clinic population.
Sutovsky P; Hauser R; Sutovsky M
Hum Reprod; 2004 Mar; 19(3):628-38. PubMed ID: 14998962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semen washing procedures do not eliminate human papilloma virus sperm infection in infertile patients.
Foresta C; Pizzol D; Bertoldo A; Menegazzo M; Barzon L; Garolla A
Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov; 96(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 21536283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semen quality and age-specific changes: a study between two decades on 3,729 male partners of couples with normal sperm count and attending an andrology laboratory for infertility-related problems in an Indian city.
Mukhopadhyay D; Varghese AC; Pal M; Banerjee SK; Bhattacharyya AK; Sharma RK; Agarwal A
Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2247-54. PubMed ID: 19328484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence and impact of hyperviscosity on sperm parameters of Malawian men seeking assisted reproduction.
Lampiao F; Chisaka J
Afr Health Sci; 2020 Mar; 20(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 33402886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semen parameters from 2002 to 2013 in Korea young population: A preliminary report.
Kim SK; Kim YS; Cho IC; Min SK
Korean J Urol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):831-6. PubMed ID: 26682024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nomograms for predicting changes in semen parameters in infertile men after varicocele repair.
Samplaski MK; Yu C; Kattan MW; Lo KC; Grober ED; Zini A; Lau S; Jarvi KA
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jul; 102(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 24825425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolution of the basic semen analysis and processing sperm.
Schardein JN; Fendereski K; Hotaling JM
Curr Opin Urol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 36226727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Estimate of the variability in the evaluation of semen analysis].
Rivera-Montes AM; Rivera-Gallegos A; Rodríguez-Villasana E; Juárez-Bengoa A; Díaz-Pérez Mde L; Hernández-Valencia M
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2013 Nov; 81(11):639-44. PubMed ID: 24483052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Racial Variation in Semen Quality at Fertility Evaluation.
Khandwala YS; Zhang CA; Li S; Behr B; Guo D; Eisenberg ML
Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():96-102. PubMed ID: 28522219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study.
Agarwal A; Deepinder F; Sharma RK; Ranga G; Li J
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 17482179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Headless spermatozoa in semen specimens from fertile and subfertile men.
Panidis D; Rousso D; Kourtis A; Gianoulis C; Papathanasiou K; Kalachanis J
J Reprod Med; 2001 Nov; 46(11):947-50. PubMed ID: 11762149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
