These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27329533)

  • 1. Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement.
    Perrault EK; Nazione SA
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 27329533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research.
    Perrault EK; Keating DM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 29117849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How informed is online informed consent?
    Varnhagen CK; Gushta M; Daniels J; Peters TC; Parmar N; Law D; Hirsch R; Takach BS; Johnson T
    Ethics Behav; 2005; 15(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 16127857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concise Consent Forms Appreciated-Still Not Comprehended: Applying Revised Common Rule Guidelines in Online Studies.
    Perrault EK; McCullock SP
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Oct; 14(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 31169051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Undergraduate Consent Form Reading in Relation to Conscientiousness, Procrastination, and the Point-of-Time Effect.
    Theiss JD; Hobbs WB; Giordano PJ; Brunson OM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):11-7. PubMed ID: 25746782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.
    Emanuel EJ; Boyle CW
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e2110843. PubMed ID: 33909052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed Consent for Online Research-Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms.
    Geier C; Adams RB; Mitchell KM; Holtz BE
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2021 Jul; 16(3):154-164. PubMed ID: 34029168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research.
    Ogloff JR; Otto RK
    Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):239-52. PubMed ID: 11651140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perspectives of IRB chairs on the informed consent process.
    Kane EI; Gallo JJ
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 28949842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review.
    Foe G; Larson EL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Feb; 11(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 27106889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consent form readability in university-sponsored research.
    Goldstein AO; Frasier P; Curtis P; Reid A; Kreher NE
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Jun; 42(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 8656172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are Well-Informed Potential Trial Participants More Likely to Participate?
    de Oliveira LLH; Vissoci JRN; Machado WL; Rodrigues CG; Limkakeng AT
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):363-371. PubMed ID: 29073806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Easy-to-Read Informed Consent Form for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Clinical Trials: Results from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1205 Study.
    Spellecy R; Tarima S; Denzen E; Moore H; Abhyankar S; Dawson P; Foley A; Gersten I; Horwitz M; Idossa L; Joffe S; Kamani N; King R; Lazaryan A; Morris L; Horowitz MM; Majhail NS
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2018 Oct; 24(10):2145-2151. PubMed ID: 29679770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change.
    Philipson SJ; Doyle MA; Gabram SG; Nightingale C; Philipson EH
    J Investig Med; 1995 Oct; 43(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 8528757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Personality, sex of participant, and face-to-face interaction affect reading of informed consent forms.
    Knepp MM
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Feb; 114(1):297-313. PubMed ID: 24765727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social Annotation Valence: The Impact on Online Informed Consent Beliefs and Behavior.
    Balestra M; Shaer O; Okerlund J; Westendorf L; Ball M; Nov O
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jul; 18(7):e197. PubMed ID: 27439320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms.
    Tarnowski KJ; Allen DM; Mayhall C; Kelly PA
    Pediatrics; 1990 Jan; 85(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 2296494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regulatory compliance and readability of informed consent forms in industry-sponsored drug development clinical trials.
    Dukaew N; Na Takuathung M; Sakuludomkan W; Chairaksa K; Klinjan P; Morakote N; Koonrungsesomboon N
    Clin Trials; 2023 Oct; 20(5):517-527. PubMed ID: 37194292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.
    Jefford M; Moore R
    Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):485-93. PubMed ID: 18452859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informed consent conversations and documents: A quantitative comparison.
    Koyfman SA; Reddy CA; Hizlan S; Leek AC; Kodish AE;
    Cancer; 2016 Feb; 122(3):464-9. PubMed ID: 26505269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.