228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27329533)
1. Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement.
Perrault EK; Nazione SA
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 27329533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research.
Perrault EK; Keating DM
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 29117849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How informed is online informed consent?
Varnhagen CK; Gushta M; Daniels J; Peters TC; Parmar N; Law D; Hirsch R; Takach BS; Johnson T
Ethics Behav; 2005; 15(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 16127857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concise Consent Forms Appreciated-Still Not Comprehended: Applying Revised Common Rule Guidelines in Online Studies.
Perrault EK; McCullock SP
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Oct; 14(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 31169051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Undergraduate Consent Form Reading in Relation to Conscientiousness, Procrastination, and the Point-of-Time Effect.
Theiss JD; Hobbs WB; Giordano PJ; Brunson OM
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):11-7. PubMed ID: 25746782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.
Emanuel EJ; Boyle CW
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e2110843. PubMed ID: 33909052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed Consent for Online Research-Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms.
Geier C; Adams RB; Mitchell KM; Holtz BE
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2021 Jul; 16(3):154-164. PubMed ID: 34029168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research.
Ogloff JR; Otto RK
Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):239-52. PubMed ID: 11651140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perspectives of IRB chairs on the informed consent process.
Kane EI; Gallo JJ
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 28949842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review.
Foe G; Larson EL
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Feb; 11(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 27106889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consent form readability in university-sponsored research.
Goldstein AO; Frasier P; Curtis P; Reid A; Kreher NE
J Fam Pract; 1996 Jun; 42(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 8656172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are Well-Informed Potential Trial Participants More Likely to Participate?
de Oliveira LLH; Vissoci JRN; Machado WL; Rodrigues CG; Limkakeng AT
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):363-371. PubMed ID: 29073806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Easy-to-Read Informed Consent Form for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Clinical Trials: Results from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1205 Study.
Spellecy R; Tarima S; Denzen E; Moore H; Abhyankar S; Dawson P; Foley A; Gersten I; Horwitz M; Idossa L; Joffe S; Kamani N; King R; Lazaryan A; Morris L; Horowitz MM; Majhail NS
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2018 Oct; 24(10):2145-2151. PubMed ID: 29679770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change.
Philipson SJ; Doyle MA; Gabram SG; Nightingale C; Philipson EH
J Investig Med; 1995 Oct; 43(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 8528757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Personality, sex of participant, and face-to-face interaction affect reading of informed consent forms.
Knepp MM
Psychol Rep; 2014 Feb; 114(1):297-313. PubMed ID: 24765727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Social Annotation Valence: The Impact on Online Informed Consent Beliefs and Behavior.
Balestra M; Shaer O; Okerlund J; Westendorf L; Ball M; Nov O
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jul; 18(7):e197. PubMed ID: 27439320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms.
Tarnowski KJ; Allen DM; Mayhall C; Kelly PA
Pediatrics; 1990 Jan; 85(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 2296494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regulatory compliance and readability of informed consent forms in industry-sponsored drug development clinical trials.
Dukaew N; Na Takuathung M; Sakuludomkan W; Chairaksa K; Klinjan P; Morakote N; Koonrungsesomboon N
Clin Trials; 2023 Oct; 20(5):517-527. PubMed ID: 37194292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.
Jefford M; Moore R
Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):485-93. PubMed ID: 18452859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent conversations and documents: A quantitative comparison.
Koyfman SA; Reddy CA; Hizlan S; Leek AC; Kodish AE;
Cancer; 2016 Feb; 122(3):464-9. PubMed ID: 26505269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
