These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27329533)

  • 21. Readability of Invasive Procedure Consent Forms.
    Eltorai AE; Naqvi SS; Ghanian S; Eberson CP; Weiss AP; Born CT; Daniels AH
    Clin Transl Sci; 2015 Dec; 8(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 26678039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Readability and Content Assessment of Informed Consent Forms for Medical Procedures in Croatia.
    Vučemilo L; Borovečki A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138017. PubMed ID: 26376183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Readability and Understanding of Informed Consent Among Participants With Low Incomes: A Preliminary Report.
    Ittenbach RF; Senft EC; Huang G; Corsmo JJ; Sieber JE
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):444-8. PubMed ID: 26564942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Should consent forms used in clinical trials be translated into the local dialects? A survey among past participants in rural Ghana.
    Baiden F; Akazili J; Chatio S; Achana FS; Oduro AR; Ravinetto R; Hodgson A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):234-9. PubMed ID: 26452387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Satisfying the needs of Japanese cancer patients: a comparative study of detailed and standard informed consent documents.
    Sato K; Watanabe T; Katsumata N; Sato T; Ohashi Y
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 24408900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Randomization to standard and concise informed consent forms: development of evidence-based consent practices.
    Enama ME; Hu Z; Gordon I; Costner P; Ledgerwood JE; Grady C;
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Sep; 33(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 22542645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving quality of the informed consent process: Developing an easy-to-read, multimodal, patient-centered format in a real-world setting.
    Lindsley KA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 May; 102(5):944-951. PubMed ID: 30635222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Some researchers wear yellow pants, but even fewer participants read consent forms: Exploring and improving consent form reading in human subjects research.
    Douglas BD; McGorray EL; Ewell PJ
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Feb; 26(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 32191107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families?
    Grossman SA; Piantadosi S; Covahey C
    J Clin Oncol; 1994 Oct; 12(10):2211-5. PubMed ID: 7931491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can your research subjects read your study's informed consent form?
    Hooker EZ
    SCI Nurs; 1995 Jun; 12(2):57-8. PubMed ID: 7624753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of readability on the impact and recall of written informed consent material.
    Handelsman MM; Martin WL
    Prof Psychol Res Pr; 1992 Dec; 23(6):500-3. PubMed ID: 16047425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Low quality and lack of clarity of current informed consent forms in cardiology: how to improve them.
    Terranova G; Ferro M; Carpeggiani C; Recchia V; Braga L; Semelka RC; Picano E
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 5(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 22698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the readability statistics of national consent forms in the UK.
    Williamson JM; Martin AG
    Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Feb; 64(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 20456172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are We Misjudging How Well Informed Consent Forms are Read?
    McNutt LA; Waltermaurer E; Bednarczyk RA; Carlson BE; Kotval J; McCauley J; Campbell JC; Ford DE
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2008 Mar; 3(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 19385786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Research participant information sheets are difficult to read.
    Franck L; Winter I
    Bull Med Ethics; 2004 Feb; (195):13-6. PubMed ID: 15812989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability.
    Meade CD; Howser DM
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1992; 19(10):1523-8. PubMed ID: 1461766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Informed consent and the readability of the written consent form.
    Sivanadarajah N; El-Daly I; Mamarelis G; Sohail MZ; Bates P
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2017 Nov; 99(8):645-649. PubMed ID: 29046092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interactive informed consent: randomized comparison with paper consents.
    Rowbotham MC; Astin J; Greene K; Cummings SR
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58603. PubMed ID: 23484041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dental school patients' understanding of informed consent.
    Ghafurian R
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Dec; 73(12):1394-400. PubMed ID: 20007495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Consent to Sterilization section of the Medicaid-Title XIX form: is it understandable?
    Zite NB; Philipson SJ; Wallace LS
    Contraception; 2007 Apr; 75(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 17362702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.