454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27329606)
1. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction.
Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Working memory load and distraction: dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control.
Konstantinou N; Beal E; King JR; Lavie N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1985-97. PubMed ID: 25085738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
Koshino H
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory working memory load impairs visual ventral stream processing: toward a unified model of attentional load.
Klemen J; Büchel C; Bühler M; Menz MM; Rose M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 22(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 19302005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of time on task on mind wandering and visual working memory.
Krimsky M; Forster DE; Llabre MM; Jha AP
Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():84-90. PubMed ID: 28865286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Brain systems underlying attentional control and emotional distraction during working memory encoding.
Ziaei M; Peira N; Persson J
Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():276-86. PubMed ID: 24185015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.
Zhang W; Luck SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25365573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Load theory behind the wheel; perceptual and cognitive load effects.
Murphy G; Greene CM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Sep; 71(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 28604027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Processing of emotional distraction is both automatic and modulated by attention: evidence from an event-related fMRI investigation.
Shafer AT; Matveychuk D; Penney T; O'Hare AJ; Stokes J; Dolcos F
J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 May; 24(5):1233-52. PubMed ID: 22332805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction.
Lorenc ES; Sreenivasan KK; Nee DE; Vandenbroucke ARE; D'Esposito M
J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 38(23):5267-5276. PubMed ID: 29739867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interactions Between Modality of Working Memory Load and Perceptual Load in Distractor Processing.
Koshino H; Olid P
J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(3):135-49. PubMed ID: 26273937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Harnessing the wandering mind: the role of perceptual load.
Forster S; Lavie N
Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):345-55. PubMed ID: 19327760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How does cognitive load influence speech perception? An encoding hypothesis.
Mitterer H; Mattys SL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):344-351. PubMed ID: 27604285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cognitive load effects on early visual perceptual processing.
Liu P; Forte J; Sewell D; Carter O
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):929-950. PubMed ID: 29363029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Behind the scenes: how visual memory load biases selective attention during processing of visual streams.
Klaver P; Talsma D
Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1133-46. PubMed ID: 24015992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
