These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27329654)

  • 1. Impact assessment of a pay-for-performance program on breast cancer screening in France using micro data.
    Sicsic J; Franc C
    Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Jun; 18(5):609-621. PubMed ID: 27329654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The true impact of the French pay-for-performance program on physicians' benzodiazepines prescription behavior.
    Michel-Lepage A; Ventelou B
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Jul; 17(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26304210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of a pay for performance programme on French GPs' consultation length.
    Saint-Lary O; Sicsic J
    Health Policy; 2015 Apr; 119(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 25458971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why did most French GPs choose not to join the voluntary national pay-for-performance program?
    Saint-Lary O; Bernard E; Sicsic J; Plu I; François-Purssell I; Franc C
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e72684. PubMed ID: 24039794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer screening in women aged 50-74 years: is there room for improvement?
    Morère JF; Pivot X; Viguier J; Blay JY; Calazel-Benque A; Coscas Y; Roussel C; Eisinger F
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2011 Jan; 20 Suppl 1():S8-S12. PubMed ID: 21245683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of welfare systems on pay-for-performance programs for general practitioners: A critical review.
    Ammi M; Fortier G
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Apr; 178():157-166. PubMed ID: 28226301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Contract for improving professional practices: What is the impact perceived by GPs?].
    Laurent F; Sicsic J; Saint-Lary O
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2015 Apr; 63(2):67-76. PubMed ID: 25819993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of financial incentives on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening delivery rates: Results from a systematic literature review.
    Mauro M; Rotundo G; Giancotti M
    Health Policy; 2019 Dec; 123(12):1210-1220. PubMed ID: 31587819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics of women using organized or opportunistic breast cancer screening in France. Analysis of the 2006 French Health, Health Care and Insurance Survey.
    Duport N
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Dec; 60(6):421-30. PubMed ID: 23146369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of general practitioners' sex and age on systematic recommendation for cancer screening.
    Eisinger F; Pivot X; Coscas Y; Viguier J; Calazel-Benque A; Blay JY; Roussel C; Morère JF
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2011 Jan; 20 Suppl 1():S39-41. PubMed ID: 21245680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of provider and patient reminders, deployment of nurse practitioners, and financial incentives on cervical and breast cancer screening rates.
    Kaczorowski J; Hearps SJ; Lohfeld L; Goeree R; Donald F; Burgess K; Sebaldt RJ
    Can Fam Physician; 2013 Jun; 59(6):e282-9. PubMed ID: 23766067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of the pay-for-performance program for breast cancer care in Taiwan.
    Kuo RN; Chung KP; Lai MS
    Am J Manag Care; 2011 May; 17(5 Spec No):e203-11. PubMed ID: 21711072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of organized breast cancer screening on mammography use: Evidence from France.
    Buchmueller TC; Goldzahl L
    Health Econ; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1963-1980. PubMed ID: 30084221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Difficulties in implementing an organized screening program for breast cancer in Brazil with emphasis on diagnostic methods.
    Silva TB; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Jacobs LA; Shulman LN
    Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(2):2321. PubMed ID: 23597169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer care.
    Timmers JM; den Heeten GJ; Adang EM; Otten JD; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
    Eur J Public Health; 2012 Dec; 22(6):925-9. PubMed ID: 22158996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations in primary care: an explanatory study among French general practitioners.
    Sicsic J; Le Vaillant M; Franc C
    Health Policy; 2012 Dec; 108(2-3):140-8. PubMed ID: 22995769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Organized breast cancer screening].
    Rouëssé J; Sancho-Garnier H;
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2014 Feb; 198(2):369-86. PubMed ID: 26263710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the proportion of pay linked to performance affect the job satisfaction of general practitioners?
    Allen T; Whittaker W; Sutton M
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Jan; 173():9-17. PubMed ID: 27914316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association Between a National Insurer's Pay-for-Performance Program for Oncology and Changes in Prescribing of Evidence-Based Cancer Drugs and Spending.
    Bekelman JE; Gupta A; Fishman E; Debono D; Fisch MJ; Liu Y; Sylwestrzak G; Barron J; Navathe AS
    J Clin Oncol; 2020 Dec; 38(34):4055-4063. PubMed ID: 33021865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An examination of pay-for-performance in general practice in Australia.
    Greene J
    Health Serv Res; 2013 Aug; 48(4):1415-32. PubMed ID: 23350933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.