These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27329883)

  • 1. [Comparison of the shaping ability of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in the preparation of simulated curved root canals].
    Qiu N; Wang CY; Liu YF; Yu XQ; Xue M
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Apr; 25(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 27329883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of the shaping ability of four Ni-Ti rotary instruments in the preparation of simulated curved root canals].
    Duan YY; Hu N; Jiang Z; Xiao XM; Su Q
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Jun; 21(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22885487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shaping Ability of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne Primary in Severely Curved Resin Blocks.
    Tavanafar S; Gilani PV; Saleh AM; Schäfer E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 31204330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of shaping ability of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in preparation of curved root canals].
    Jiang HC; Tang LL; Han WL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2022 Feb; 31(1):44-47. PubMed ID: 35587667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of two different nickel-titanium rotary files in curved root canals of extracted human molar teeth.
    Ferrara G; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Ceci C; Del Fabbro M; Machtou P
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26343421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparative study of shaping ability between rotary ProTaper and Flexofile].
    Yang GB; Zheng YL; Xu WQ; Li HL; Wu HK
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 25(4):386-9. PubMed ID: 17896499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals.
    Wu H; Peng C; Bai Y; Hu X; Wang L; Li C
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25886847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shaping Ability of ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and Reciproc in Simulated Root Canals.
    Maia Filho EM; Dos Reis Santos RM; Lima DM; da Silva Pereira SM; Soares JA; de Jesus Tavarez RR; Ferreira MC; Carvalho CN; Bandeca MC; Tonetto MR; Borges AH; de Castro Rizzi C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):902-906. PubMed ID: 27965498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
    Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
    Ayar LR; Love RM
    Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Shaping ability of multi-taper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin curved root canal].
    Luo HX; Huang DM; Jia LH; Luo SG; Gao XJ; Tan H; Zhou XD
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 24(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 16999355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Root Canal Surface Strain and Canal Center Transportation Induced by 3 Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instrument Systems.
    Liu W; Wu B
    J Endod; 2016 Feb; 42(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 26686822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals.
    Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 24697590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
    Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating instruments in simulated S-shaped canals].
    Shao T; Hou X; Hou B
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 May; 49(5):279-83. PubMed ID: 25030999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.