These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27330058)

  • 1. The Role of Proliferation in Determining Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Gene Expression-Based Meta-Analysis.
    Stover DG; Coloff JL; Barry WT; Brugge JS; Winer EP; Selfors LM
    Clin Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 22(24):6039-6050. PubMed ID: 27330058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in Expression of Genes Representing Key Biologic Processes after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer, and Prognostic Implications in Residual Disease.
    Klintman M; Buus R; Cheang MC; Sheri A; Smith IE; Dowsett M
    Clin Cancer Res; 2016 May; 22(10):2405-16. PubMed ID: 27179111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic and predictive value of NanoString-based immune-related gene signatures in a neoadjuvant setting of triple-negative breast cancer: relationship to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.
    Lee HJ; Lee JJ; Song IH; Park IA; Kang J; Yu JH; Ahn JH; Gong G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 151(3):619-27. PubMed ID: 26006068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gene expression profiles of breast cancer obtained from core cut biopsies before neoadjuvant docetaxel, adriamycin, and cyclophoshamide chemotherapy correlate with routine prognostic markers and could be used to identify predictive signatures.
    Rody A; Karn T; Gätje R; Kourtis K; Minckwitz G; Loibl S; Munnes M; Ruckhäberle E; Holtrich U; Kaufmann M; Ahr A
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Apr; 128(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 16673249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics.
    Lips EH; Mulder L; de Ronde JJ; Mandjes IA; Vincent A; Vrancken Peeters MT; Nederlof PM; Wesseling J; Rodenhuis S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 131(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 21472434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A meta-analysis of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer.
    Wang D; Feng J; Xu B
    Future Oncol; 2019 Aug; 15(23):2779-2790. PubMed ID: 31293180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subtype-Specific Metagene-Based Prediction of Outcome after Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer.
    Callari M; Cappelletti V; D'Aiuto F; Musella V; Lembo A; Petel F; Karn T; Iwamoto T; Provero P; Daidone MG; Gianni L; Bianchini G
    Clin Cancer Res; 2016 Jan; 22(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 26423797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of Immunophenotype With Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the BrighTNess Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Filho OM; Stover DG; Asad S; Ansell PJ; Watson M; Loibl S; Geyer CE; Bae J; Collier K; Cherian M; O'Shaughnessy J; Untch M; Rugo HS; Huober JB; Golshan M; Sikov WM; von Minckwitz G; Rastogi P; Maag D; Wolmark N; Denkert C; Symmans WF
    JAMA Oncol; 2021 Apr; 7(4):603-608. PubMed ID: 33599688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross comparison and prognostic assessment of breast cancer multigene signatures in a large population-based contemporary clinical series.
    Vallon-Christersson J; Häkkinen J; Hegardt C; Saal LH; Larsson C; Ehinger A; Lindman H; Olofsson H; Sjöblom T; Wärnberg F; Ryden L; Loman N; Malmberg M; Borg Å; Staaf J
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):12184. PubMed ID: 31434940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Evolution of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: From Biology to Novel Therapeutics.
    Anders CK; Abramson V; Tan T; Dent R
    Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2016; 35():34-42. PubMed ID: 27249684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.
    Carey LA; Dees EC; Sawyer L; Gatti L; Moore DT; Collichio F; Ollila DW; Sartor CI; Graham ML; Perou CM
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Apr; 13(8):2329-34. PubMed ID: 17438091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic value of Ki67 expression in HR-negative breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Tan QX; Qin QH; Yang WP; Mo QG; Wei CY
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(10):6862-70. PubMed ID: 25400769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complete Metabolic Response on Interim
    Chen S; Ibrahim NK; Yan Y; Wong ST; Wang H; Wong FC
    Oncologist; 2017 May; 22(5):526-534. PubMed ID: 28377466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FDG PET/CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy may predict response in ER-positive/HER2-negative and triple negative, but not in HER2-positive breast cancer.
    Koolen BB; Pengel KE; Wesseling J; Vogel WV; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Vincent AD; Gilhuijs KG; Rodenhuis S; Rutgers EJ; Valdés Olmos RA
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 23414930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk stratification of triple-negative breast cancer with core gene signatures associated with chemoresponse and prognosis.
    Kim EK; Park AK; Ko E; Park WY; Lee KM; Noh DY; Han W
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Nov; 178(1):185-197. PubMed ID: 31342312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinicopathological features of early failure of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.
    Choi MK; Park YH; Kil WH; Lee JE; Nam SJ; Ahn JS; Im YH
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2014 Sep; 74(3):521-9. PubMed ID: 25047725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinicopathological analysis of homologous recombination-deficient breast cancers with special reference to response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel followed by FEC.
    Imanishi S; Naoi Y; Shimazu K; Shimoda M; Kagara N; Tanei T; Miyake T; Kim SJ; Noguchi S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 174(3):627-637. PubMed ID: 30607631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of Biomarkers Including 18FDG-PET/CT for Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
    Humbert O; Riedinger JM; Charon-Barra C; Berriolo-Riedinger A; Desmoulins I; Lorgis V; Kanoun S; Coutant C; Fumoleau P; Cochet A; Brunotte F
    Clin Cancer Res; 2015 Dec; 21(24):5460-8. PubMed ID: 26130460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive Value of Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio for Efficacy of Preoperative Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
    Asano Y; Kashiwagi S; Onoda N; Noda S; Kawajiri H; Takashima T; Ohsawa M; Kitagawa S; Hirakawa K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1104-10. PubMed ID: 26511266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative Prognostic and Predictive Value of Gene Signature and Histologic Grade in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.
    Iwamoto T; Kelly C; Mizoo T; Nogami T; Motoki T; Shien T; Taira N; Hayashi N; Niikura N; Fujiwara T; Doihara H; Matsuoka J
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Apr; 16(2):95-100.e1. PubMed ID: 26631838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.