These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27330620)

  • 1. From the editor's desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript.
    Bhargava P; Agrawal G
    Radiol Case Rep; 2013; 8(1):824. PubMed ID: 27330620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Write a scientific paper (WASP): Editor's perspective of submissions and dealing with editors.
    Cuschieri S; Vassallo J
    Early Hum Dev; 2019 Feb; 129():93-95. PubMed ID: 30578111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: Revising a Peer-reviewed Manuscript.
    Bahadoran Z; Mirmiran P; Kashfi K; Ghasemi A
    Int J Endocrinol Metab; 2022 Jan; 20(1):e120366. PubMed ID: 35432554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Science, politics, and peer review. An editor's dilemma.
    McCarty R
    Am Psychol; 2002 Mar; 57(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 11905119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound during 2012.
    Lamb CR; Mai W
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 24798652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dealing with returned manuscripts.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Nov; 50(11):1050-2; quiz 1053. PubMed ID: 19960157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the effect of editor-author relations on manuscript handling times.
    Sarigöl E; Garcia D; Scholtes I; Schweitzer F
    Scientometrics; 2017; 113(1):609-631. PubMed ID: 29056793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reviewing an Original Research Manuscript for the International Journal of Exercise Science: A Guide for Students and Professionals.
    Simpson KJ
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2008; 1(2):43-49. PubMed ID: 27182294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.
    Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An integrated approach to research and manuscript development.
    Roederer M; Marciniak MW; O'Connor SK; Eckel SF
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2013 Jul; 70(14):1211-8. PubMed ID: 23820457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication?
    Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J
    Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction.
    Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callaham ML
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2790-3. PubMed ID: 12038913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revising a manuscript: ten principles to guide success for publication.
    Provenzale JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):W382-7. PubMed ID: 21098168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
    Lamb CR; Adams CA
    Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revision of manuscripts for scholarly publication.
    Dowd SB; McElveny C
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 69(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 9323765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From the MJM Editors' Desk: Common errors authors make in submission to the Medical Journal of Malaysia.
    Rampal L; Liew BS; Oothuman P; Philip R; Mohd Sidik S; Hoe VC; Baharudin A
    Med J Malaysia; 2020 Jul; 75(4):323-324. PubMed ID: 32728008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sharing Your Practice Expertise: Writing Clinical Manuscripts for Publication.
    McGrath JM; Brandon D
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2015 Aug; 15(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 26225587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality science and quality assurance: observations of an environmental scientist.
    Hughes TJ
    Qual Assur; 1999; 7(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 11191123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.