These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27330620)

  • 21. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.
    Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 9676668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics.
    Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Odibo AO; Chauhan SP; Smulian JC; Oyelese Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):703.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24983685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Peer review and editorial decision-making.
    Howard L; Wilkinson G
    Br J Psychiatry; 1998 Aug; 173():110-3; discussion 114-5. PubMed ID: 9850221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
    Loonen MP; Hage JJ; Kon M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1461-72; discussion 1473-5. PubMed ID: 16217496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts.
    Garfunkel JM; Lawson EE; Hamrick HJ; Ulshen MH
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1376-8. PubMed ID: 2304217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Peer review at the Health Information and Libraries Journal.
    Grant MJ
    Health Info Libr J; 2014 Dec; 31(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 25443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal.
    Turcotte C; Drolet P; Girard M
    Can J Anaesth; 2004; 51(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 15197116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [What do reviewers look for in 'original articles' submitted for publication in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde?].
    Tjon MJ; Sang F; Overbeke AJ; Lockefeer JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1996 Nov; 140(47):2349-52. PubMed ID: 8984399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [How to review English-written manuscripts submitted to peer-review journals].
    Asano E
    No To Shinkei; 2005 Oct; 57(10):877-81. PubMed ID: 16277232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Responding to reviewers' comments as part of writing for publication.
    Happell B
    Nurse Res; 2011; 18(4):23-7. PubMed ID: 21853889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. You're a published author!
    Wachs JE; Williamson G; Moore PV; Roy D; Childre F
    AAOHN J; 2010 Jun; 58(6):233-6. PubMed ID: 20677718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Avoiding the question approach: making direct comments in manuscript reviews.
    Johnson SH
    Nurse Author Ed; 1995; 5(3):7-10. PubMed ID: 7613564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Writing a letter to the Editor.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2010 Jul; 51(7):532-5. PubMed ID: 20730391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Writing for scientific medical manuscript: a guide for preparing manuscript submitted to biomedical journals.
    Setiati S; Harimurti K
    Acta Med Indones; 2007; 39(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 17297211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Revising a book chapter written by a previous author.
    Tamburri LM; Hix CD; Sole ML
    Nurse Author Ed; 2002; 12(3):7-9. PubMed ID: 12092431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Re: Journal Standards - Editor's reply.
    Jolly PD
    N Z Vet J; 2003 Aug; 51(4):199. PubMed ID: 16032326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part II. Optimizing the manuscript: practical hints for improving the quality of reviews.
    Levine AM; Heckman JD; Hensinger RN
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():689-97. PubMed ID: 15116659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. From the History of the Croatian Dermatovenereological Society - The Croatian Medical Association and an Overview of Important Information Regarding the Journal Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica.
    Dobrić I
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2018 Dec; 26(4):344-348. PubMed ID: 30665489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. From the editor's desk: Common errors in submission of case reports.
    Heller M; Kontzialis M; Anderson A; Bhargava P
    Radiol Case Rep; 2012; 7(4):771. PubMed ID: 27330603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.