367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27331653)
1. Are we going about chemical risk assessment for the aquatic environment the wrong way?
Johnson AC; Sumpter JP
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1609-16. PubMed ID: 27331653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ecotoxicological risk assessment of chosen pharmaceuticals detected in surface waters.
Załęska-Radziwiłł M; Affek K; Doskocz N
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2017 Nov; 52(13):1233-1239. PubMed ID: 28949837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Capturing ecology in modeling approaches applied to environmental risk assessment of endocrine active chemicals in fish.
Mintram KS; Brown AR; Maynard SK; Thorbek P; Tyler CR
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 48(2):109-120. PubMed ID: 28929839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A rational approach to selecting and ranking some pharmaceuticals of concern for the aquatic environment and their relative importance compared with other chemicals.
Donnachie RL; Johnson AC; Sumpter JP
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Apr; 35(4):1021-7. PubMed ID: 26184376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products: A critical review of the impacts on fish reproduction.
Overturf MD; Anderson JC; Pandelides Z; Beyger L; Holdway DA
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2015 Jul; 45(6):469-91. PubMed ID: 25945515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification, assessment and management of "endocrine disruptors" in wildlife in the EU substance legislation--discussion paper from the German Federal Environment Agency (UBA).
Frische T; Bachmann J; Frein D; Juffernholz T; Kehrer A; Klein A; Maack G; Stock F; Stolzenberg HC; Thierbach C; Walter-Rohde S
Toxicol Lett; 2013 Dec; 223(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 23500481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How do we take the pulse of an aquatic ecosystem? Current and historical approaches to measuring ecosystem integrity.
Maloney EM
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Feb; 38(2):289-301. PubMed ID: 30387526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population-relevant endpoints in the evaluation of endocrine-active substances (EAS) for ecotoxicological hazard and risk assessment.
Marty MS; Blankinship A; Chambers J; Constantine L; Kloas W; Kumar A; Lagadic L; Meador J; Pickford D; Schwarz T; Verslycke T
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):317-330. PubMed ID: 28052490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exposure and ecotoxicological risk assessment of mixtures of top prescribed pharmaceuticals in Swedish freshwaters.
Lindim C; de Zwart D; Cousins IT; Kutsarova S; Kühne R; Schüürmann G
Chemosphere; 2019 Apr; 220():344-352. PubMed ID: 30590300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Numerical-ecotoxicological approach to assess potential risk associated with oilfield production chemicals discharged into the sea.
Manfra L; Cianelli D; Di Mento R; Zambianchi E
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jun; 25(18):18213-18219. PubMed ID: 29808402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of the evidence for endocrine disrupting effects of current-use chemicals on wildlife populations.
Matthiessen P; Wheeler JR; Weltje L
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 Mar; 48(3):195-216. PubMed ID: 29171327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Species sensitivity distributions for use in environmental protection, assessment, and management of aquatic ecosystems for 12 386 chemicals.
Posthuma L; van Gils J; Zijp MC; van de Meent D; de Zwart D
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Apr; 38(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30675920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endocrine Disruption and In Vitro Ecotoxicology: Recent Advances and Approaches.
Wagner M; Kienle C; Vermeirssen ELM; Oehlmann J
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2017; 157():1-58. PubMed ID: 28154885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental behavior and eco-toxicity of xylene in aquatic environments: A review.
Duan W; Meng F; Wang F; Liu Q
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Nov; 145():324-332. PubMed ID: 28756253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical review: Grand challenges in assessing the adverse effects of contaminants of emerging concern on aquatic food webs.
Nilsen E; Smalling KL; Ahrens L; Gros M; Miglioranza KSB; Picó Y; Schoenfuss HL
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Jan; 38(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 30294805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vitellogenin levels and others biomarkers show evidences of endocrine disruption in fish species from Iguaçu River - Southern Brazil.
Yamamoto FY; Garcia JRE; Kupsco A; Oliveira Ribeiro CA
Chemosphere; 2017 Nov; 186():88-99. PubMed ID: 28772185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aquatic exposures of chemical mixtures in urban environments: Approaches to impact assessment.
de Zwart D; Adams W; Galay Burgos M; Hollender J; Junghans M; Merrington G; Muir D; Parkerton T; De Schamphelaere KAC; Whale G; Williams R
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Mar; 37(3):703-714. PubMed ID: 28861906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and sexual behaviors in fish--a critical review on effects and possible consequences.
Söffker M; Tyler CR
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2012 Sep; 42(8):653-68. PubMed ID: 22697575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chemical analysis of fish bile extracts for monitoring endocrine disrupting chemical exposure in water: Bisphenol A, alkylphenols, and norethindrone.
Wu M; Pan C; Yang M; Xu B; Lei X; Ma J; Cai L; Chen J
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jan; 35(1):182-90. PubMed ID: 26206390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Applying adverse outcome pathways and species sensitivity-weighted distribution to predicted-no-effect concentration derivation and quantitative ecological risk assessment for bisphenol A and 4-nonylphenol in aquatic environments: A case study on Tianjin City, China.
Wang Y; Na G; Zong H; Ma X; Yang X; Mu J; Wang L; Lin Z; Zhang Z; Wang J; Zhao J
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Feb; 37(2):551-562. PubMed ID: 28984376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
