BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27332161)

  • 1. A Quantitative Study Investigating the Effects of Computerised Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department.
    Bennett P; Hardiker N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():53-7. PubMed ID: 27332161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerised clinical decision support systems to improve medication safety in long-term care homes: a systematic review.
    Marasinghe KM
    BMJ Open; 2015 May; 5(5):e006539. PubMed ID: 25967986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A retrospective study of complaint letters sent to a Swiss Emergency Department between 2009 and 2014.
    Pfeil MN; Yersin B; Trueb L; Feiner AS; Carron PN
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2018 Feb; 66(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 29310987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving patient safety through the introduction of a formal triage process.
    Evans C; Hughes C; Ferguson J
    Emerg Nurse; 2017 Feb; 24(9):19-25. PubMed ID: 28185499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving vital sign documentation at triage: an emergency department quality improvement project.
    di Martino P; Leoli F; Cinotti F; Virga A; Gatta L; Kleefield S; Melandri R
    J Patient Saf; 2011 Mar; 7(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 21921864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emergency department patient safety incident characterization: an observational analysis of the findings of a standardized peer review process.
    Jepson ZK; Darling CE; Kotkowski KA; Bird SB; Arce MW; Volturo GA; Reznek MA
    BMC Emerg Med; 2014 Aug; 14():20. PubMed ID: 25106803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using the Five-Level Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale Computerized System: Factors in Decision Making by Emergency Department Triage Nurses.
    Chang W; Liu HE; Goopy S; Chen LC; Chen HJ; Han CY
    Clin Nurs Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):651-666. PubMed ID: 26935346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does nonmedical hospital admission staff accurately triage emergency department patients?
    Quitt J; Ryser D; Dieterle T; Lüscher U; Martina B; Tschudi P
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2009 Aug; 16(4):172-6. PubMed ID: 19318963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systems for recognition and response to deteriorating emergency department patients: a scoping review.
    Considine J; Fry M; Curtis K; Shaban RZ
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2021 May; 29(1):69. PubMed ID: 34022933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Decision Support Systems for Triage in the Emergency Department using Intelligent Systems: a Review.
    Fernandes M; Vieira SM; Leite F; Palos C; Finkelstein S; Sousa JMC
    Artif Intell Med; 2020 Jan; 102():101762. PubMed ID: 31980099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to improve vital sign data quality for use in clinical decision support systems? A qualitative study in nine Swedish emergency departments.
    Skyttberg N; Vicente J; Chen R; Blomqvist H; Koch S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jun; 16():61. PubMed ID: 27260476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of emergency department load relief area--gauging benefits in empirical terms.
    Rasheed F; Lee YH; Kim SH; Park IC
    Simul Healthc; 2012 Dec; 7(6):343-52. PubMed ID: 22960699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrete event simulation of emergency department activity: a platform for system-level operations research.
    Connelly LG; Bair AE
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 11(11):1177-85. PubMed ID: 15528582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrospective analysis of quality improvement throughput measures at a high-volume community emergency department.
    Milsten A; Klein J; Liu Q; Vibhakar N; Linder L
    J Healthc Qual; 2014; 36(5):13-25. PubMed ID: 23731214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of computerized clinical decision support systems in emergency care: a substantive review of the literature.
    Bennett P; Hardiker NR
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 May; 24(3):655-668. PubMed ID: 28031285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Decision Support Systems in the Emergency Department: Opportunities to Improve Triage Accuracy.
    Stone EL
    J Emerg Nurs; 2019 Mar; 45(2):220-222. PubMed ID: 30846145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients.
    Dale J; Williams S; Foster T; Higgins J; Snooks H; Crouch R; Hartley-Sharpe C; Glucksman E; George S
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Oct; 13(5):363-73. PubMed ID: 15465940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical error prevention in ED triage for ACS: use of cardiac care decision support and quality improvement feedback.
    Daudelin DH; Selker HP
    Cardiol Clin; 2005 Nov; 23(4):601-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16278128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and efficiency of triaging low urgent self-referred patients to a general practitioner at an acute care post: an observational study.
    van der Straten LM; van Stel HF; Spee FJ; Vreeburg ME; Schrijvers AJ; Sturms LM
    Emerg Med J; 2012 Nov; 29(11):877-81. PubMed ID: 22158535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving emergency department time to provider, left-without-treatment rates, and average length of stay.
    Sharieff GQ; Burnell L; Cantonis M; Norton V; Tovar J; Roberts K; VanWyk C; Saucier J; Russe J
    J Emerg Med; 2013 Sep; 45(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 23747050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.