242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27333205)
1. Comparison of real-time instruments and gravimetric method when measuring particulate matter in a residential building.
Wang Z; Calderón L; Patton AP; Sorensen Allacci M; Senick J; Wener R; Andrews CJ; Mainelis G
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Nov; 66(11):1109-1120. PubMed ID: 27333205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of continuous particle monitors for personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures.
Wallace LA; Wheeler AJ; Kearney J; Van Ryswyk K; You H; Kulka RH; Rasmussen PE; Brook JR; Xu X
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2011; 21(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 20502493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of fine particle measurements from a direct-reading instrument and a gravimetric sampling method.
Kim JY; Magari SR; Herrick RF; Smith TJ; Christiani DC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Nov; 1(11):707-15. PubMed ID: 15673091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the TSI Model 8520 and Grimm Series 1.108 portable aerosol instruments used to monitor particulate matter in an iron foundry.
Cheng YH
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Mar; 5(3):157-68. PubMed ID: 18188737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response of consumer and research grade indoor air quality monitors to residential sources of fine particles.
Singer BC; Delp WW
Indoor Air; 2018 Jul; 28(4):624-639. PubMed ID: 29683219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Workplace aerosol mass concentration measurement using optical particle counters.
Görner P; Simon X; Bémer D; Lidén G
J Environ Monit; 2012 Feb; 14(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 22009365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of light scattering devices and impactors for particulate measurements in indoor, outdoor, and personal environments.
Liu LJ; Slaughter JC; Larson TV
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Jul; 36(13):2977-86. PubMed ID: 12144275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory and field evaluation of real-time and near real-time PM
Mehadi A; Moosmüller H; Campbell DE; Ham W; Schweizer D; Tarnay L; Hunter J
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Feb; 70(2):158-179. PubMed ID: 31403397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variation in gravimetric correction factors for nephelometer-derived estimates of personal exposure to PM
Tryner J; Good N; Wilson A; Clark ML; Peel JL; Volckens J
Environ Pollut; 2019 Jul; 250():251-261. PubMed ID: 30999202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determining PM2.5 calibration curves for a low-cost particle monitor: common indoor residential aerosols.
Dacunto PJ; Klepeis NE; Cheng KC; Acevedo-Bolton V; Jiang RT; Repace JL; Ott WR; Hildemann LM
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Nov; 17(11):1959-66. PubMed ID: 26487426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design and evaluation of a portable PM
Tryner J; Quinn C; Windom BC; Volckens J
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2019 Aug; 21(8):1403-1415. PubMed ID: 31389929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A feasible experimental framework for field calibration of portable light-scattering aerosol monitors: Case of TSI DustTrak.
Li Z; Che W; Lau AKH; Fung JCH; Lin C; Lu X
Environ Pollut; 2019 Dec; 255(Pt 1):113136. PubMed ID: 31522000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of using low-cost portable particle monitors for measurement of fine and coarse particulate matter in urban ambient air.
Han I; Symanski E; Stock TH
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):330-340. PubMed ID: 27690287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a real-time passive personal particle monitor in fixed site residential indoor and ambient measurements.
Quintana PJ; Samimi BS; Kleinman MT; Liu LJ; Soto K; Warner GY; Bufalino C; Valencia J; Francis D; Hovell MH; Delfino RJ
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2000; 10(5):437-45. PubMed ID: 11051534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of PM
Li Z; Che W; Frey HC; Lau AKH; Lin C
Environ Pollut; 2017 Sep; 228():433-442. PubMed ID: 28558284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of human exposures to household air pollution from commonly used cookstoves in Sri Lanka.
Chartier R; Phillips M; Mosquin P; Elledge M; Bronstein K; Nandasena S; Thornburg V; Thornburg J; Rodes C
Indoor Air; 2017 Jan; 27(1):147-159. PubMed ID: 26797964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling of residential indoor PM
Du Y; Wang Y; Du Z; Zhang Y; Xu D; Li T
Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul; 238():691-697. PubMed ID: 29621728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation and modeling of the residential infiltration of fine particulate matter in Beijing, China.
Xu C; Li N; Yang Y; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang Q; Zheng T; Civitarese A; Xu D
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Jun; 67(6):694-701. PubMed ID: 28010179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of air cleaners on indoor particulate matter components and oxidative potential in residential households in Beijing.
Zhan Y; Johnson K; Norris C; Shafer MM; Bergin MH; Zhang Y; Zhang J; Schauer JJ
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 626():507-518. PubMed ID: 29396331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
