These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27333583)

  • 1. Microwave corneosurfametry: a minute assessment of the skin compatibility of surfactant-containing products.
    Goffin V; Piérard-Franchimont C; Piérard GE
    Skin Res Technol; 1997 Nov; 3(4):242-4. PubMed ID: 27333583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative surfactant reactivity of canine and human stratum corneum: a plea for the use of the corneosurfametry bioassay.
    Goffin V; Fontaine J; Piérard GE
    Altern Lab Anim; 1999; 27(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 25423404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skin capacitance imaging and corneosurfametry. A comparative assessment of the impact of surfactants on stratum corneum.
    Xhauflaire-Uhoda E; Loussouarn G; Haubrechts C; Léger DS; Piérard GE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 May; 54(5):249-53. PubMed ID: 16689808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surfactant irritation: in vitro corneosurfametry and in vivo bioengineering.
    Gabard B; Chatelain E; Bieli E; Haas S
    Skin Res Technol; 2001 Feb; 7(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 11301641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corneosurfametry: a predictive assessment of the interaction of personal-care cleansing products with human stratum corneum.
    Piérard GE; Goffin V; Piérard-Franchimont C
    Dermatology; 1994; 189(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 8075443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regional differences in stratum corneum reactivity to surfactants. Quantitative assessment using the corneosurfametry bioassay.
    Henry F; Goffin V; Maibach HI; Piérard GE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Dec; 37(6):271-5. PubMed ID: 9455629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surfactant-induced dermatitis: comparison of corneosurfametry with predictive testing on human and reconstructed skin.
    Piérard GE; Goffin V; Hermanns-Lê T; Arrese JE; Piérard-Franchimont C
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1995 Sep; 33(3):462-9. PubMed ID: 7544813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modified Corneosurfametry as a new accelerated high-throughput ex vivo methodology for predicting cleanser effects towards human skin.
    Liu M; Mollica L; Regan J; Hawkins S; McGuiness H; Vetro K; Garczarek U; Shi S; Vasudevan V; Ananthapadmanabhan KP
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2016 Apr; 38(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 26352535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microwave corneosurfametry and the short-duration dansyl chloride extraction test for rating concentrated irritant surfactants.
    Goffin V; Piérard GE
    Dermatology; 2001; 202(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 11244229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Responsive corneosurfametry following in vivo skin preconditioning.
    Uhoda E; Goffin V; Pierard GE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Dec; 49(6):292-6. PubMed ID: 15025702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The SACD method and the XLRS squamometry tests revisited.
    Piérard-Franchimont C; Henry F; Piérard GE
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2000 Dec; 22(6):437-46. PubMed ID: 18503430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitive skin and stratum corneum reactivity to household cleaning products.
    Goffin V; Piérard-Franchimont C; Piérard GE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Feb; 34(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 8681562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of in vitro predictive tests for irritation induced by anionic surfactants.
    Goffin V; Paye M; Piérard GE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Jul; 33(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 7493460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Squamometry: a tool to move from exaggerated to more and more realistic application conditions for comparing the skin compatibility of surfactant-based products.
    Paye M; Cartiaux Y
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 1999 Feb; 21(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 18505531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction and measurement of surfactant action upon human skin under realistic conditions.
    Prottey C; Oliver D; Coxon AC
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 1984 Dec; 6(6):263-73. PubMed ID: 19467125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regional variability in stratum corneum reactivity to antiseptic formulations.
    Quatresooz P; Xhauflaire-Uhoda E; Piérard-Franchimont C; Piérard GE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):271-3. PubMed ID: 17441849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of organic solvents on normal human stratum corneum: evaluation by the corneoxenometry bioassay.
    Goffin V; Letawe C; Piérard GE
    Dermatology; 1997; 195(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 9529549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From observational to analytical morphology of the stratum corneum: progress avoiding hazardous animal and human testings.
    Piérard GE; Courtois J; Ritacco C; Humbert P; Fanian F; Piérard-Franchimont C
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 2015; 8():113-25. PubMed ID: 25767402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of surfactants on penetration across the skin*.
    Walters KA; Bialik W; Brain KR
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 1993 Dec; 15(6):260-71. PubMed ID: 19281616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new formula for a mild body cleanser: sodium laureth sulphate supplemented with sodium laureth carboxylate and lauryl glucoside.
    Takagi Y; Shimizu M; Morokuma Y; Miyaki M; Kiba A; Matsuo K; Isoda K; Mizutani H
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2014 Aug; 36(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 24617572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.