These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27333590)

  • 21. Randomized controlled clinical trial on the three-dimensional accuracy of fast-set impression materials.
    Rudolph H; Quaas S; Haim M; Preißler J; Walter MH; Koch R; Luthardt RG
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1397-406. PubMed ID: 22936298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changes in water contact angles during the first phase of setting of dental impression materials.
    Mondon M; Ziegler C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12675455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
    Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
    Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of Gingival Retraction Paste and Subsequent Cleaning with Hydrogen Peroxide on the Polymerization of Three Elastomeric Impression Materials: An In Vitro Study.
    Abduljabbar TS; Al Amri MD; Al Rifaiy MQ; Al-Sowygh ZH; Vohra FA; Balous MA; Alqarni AS; Alotaibi AO
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):709-714. PubMed ID: 28960658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Elastomeric impression materials].
    Levartovsky S; Folkman M; Alter E; Pilo R
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2011 Apr; 28(2):54-64, 75. PubMed ID: 21848031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electron microscopic analysis of the effects of chemical retraction agents on cultured rat keratinocytes.
    Kopac I; Sterle M; Marion L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 11807484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of disinfection on the dimensional stability of polyether impression materials.
    Yilmaz H; Aydin C; Gul B; Yilmaz C; Semiz M
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 17760866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
    Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro.
    Liu CM; Huang FM; Yang LC; Chou LS; Chou MY; Chang YC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 15089944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
    Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Studies on the impression of crown preparations by means of the double impression method with special reference to the widening of the gingival pocket].
    Weiskopf J; Frentzen H; Schönherr U
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1967 Jan; 17(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 5336041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords.
    Kumbuloglu O; User A; Toksavul S; Boyacioglu H
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Feb; 38(2):e92-8. PubMed ID: 17510720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cotton pellets and gingival retraction cords. Clinical notes No. 2.
    Tyas M
    Aust Dent J; 1984 Aug; 29(4):279. PubMed ID: 6395843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nonsurgical gingival displacement in restorative dentistry.
    Thomas MS; Joseph RM; Parolia A
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Jun; 32(5):26-34; quiz 36, 38. PubMed ID: 21755893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of the mixing technique on the content of voids in two polyether impression materials.
    Di Felice R; Scotti R; Belser UC
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2002; 112(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11892614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.