These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27334129)

  • 1. The performance of bone tissue engineering scaffolds in in vivo animal models: A systematic review.
    de Misquita MR; Bentini R; Goncalves F
    J Biomater Appl; 2016 Nov; 31(5):625-636. PubMed ID: 27334129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manufacture of degradable polymeric scaffolds for bone regeneration.
    Ge Z; Jin Z; Cao T
    Biomed Mater; 2008 Jun; 3(2):022001. PubMed ID: 18523339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design of biocomposite materials for bone tissue regeneration.
    Yunus Basha R; Sampath Kumar TS; Doble M
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Dec; 57():452-63. PubMed ID: 26354284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone regeneration and their hierarchical characterisation.
    Jones JR; Lin S; Yue S; Lee PD; Hanna JV; Smith ME; Newport RJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010 Dec; 224(12):1373-87. PubMed ID: 21287826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: A review of in vivo studies in bone defect models.
    El-Rashidy AA; Roether JA; Harhaus L; Kneser U; Boccaccini AR
    Acta Biomater; 2017 Oct; 62():1-28. PubMed ID: 28844964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative studies on ectopic bone formation in porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds with complementary pore structures.
    Wang H; Zhi W; Lu X; Li X; Duan K; Duan R; Mu Y; Weng J
    Acta Biomater; 2013 Sep; 9(9):8413-21. PubMed ID: 23732684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biologic augmentation of polymer scaffolds for bone repair.
    Guldberg RE; Oest ME; Dupont K; Peister A; Deutsch E; Kolambkar Y; Mooney D
    J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2007; 7(4):333-4. PubMed ID: 18094499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving PEEK bioactivity for craniofacial reconstruction using a 3D printed scaffold embedded with mesenchymal stem cells.
    Roskies M; Jordan JO; Fang D; Abdallah MN; Hier MP; Mlynarek A; Tamimi F; Tran SD
    J Biomater Appl; 2016 Jul; 31(1):132-9. PubMed ID: 26980549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bone augmentation with autologous periosteal cells and two different calcium phosphate scaffolds under an occlusive titanium barrier: an experimental study in rabbits.
    Maréchal M; Eyckmans J; Schrooten J; Schepers E; Luyten FP; van Steenberghe D
    J Periodontol; 2008 May; 79(5):896-904. PubMed ID: 18454669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Engineering scaffolds integrated with calcium sulfate and oyster shell for enhanced bone tissue regeneration.
    Shen Y; Yang S; Liu J; Xu H; Shi Z; Lin Z; Ying X; Guo P; Lin T; Yan S; Huang Q; Peng L
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2014 Aug; 6(15):12177-88. PubMed ID: 25033438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioactive composites for bone tissue engineering.
    Tanner KE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010 Dec; 224(12):1359-72. PubMed ID: 21287825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method of fabricating robust freeform 3D ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration.
    Seol YJ; Park DY; Park JY; Kim SW; Park SJ; Cho DW
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2013 May; 110(5):1444-55. PubMed ID: 23192318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ectopic bone regeneration by human bone marrow mononucleated cells, undifferentiated and osteogenically differentiated bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds.
    Ye X; Yin X; Yang D; Tan J; Liu G
    Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2012 Jul; 18(7):545-56. PubMed ID: 22250840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hydrophobicity as a design criterion for polymer scaffolds in bone tissue engineering.
    Jansen EJ; Sladek RE; Bahar H; Yaffe A; Gijbels MJ; Kuijer R; Bulstra SK; Guldemond NA; Binderman I; Koole LH
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(21):4423-31. PubMed ID: 15701371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3D Scaffolds with Different Stiffness but the Same Microstructure for Bone Tissue Engineering.
    Chen G; Dong C; Yang L; Lv Y
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Jul; 7(29):15790-802. PubMed ID: 26151287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Osteoblasts in bone tissue engineering.
    Jayakumar P; Di Silvio L
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010 Dec; 224(12):1415-40. PubMed ID: 21287829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The enhancement of bone regeneration by a combination of osteoconductivity and osteostimulation using β-CaSiO3/β-Ca3(PO4)2 composite bioceramics.
    Wang C; Xue Y; Lin K; Lu J; Chang J; Sun J
    Acta Biomater; 2012 Jan; 8(1):350-60. PubMed ID: 21925627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional macroporous materials for tissue engineering of craniofacial bone.
    Shakya AK; Kandalam U
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 55(9):875-891. PubMed ID: 29056355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone tissue engineering.
    Healy KE; Guldberg RE
    J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2007; 7(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 18094496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sol-gel processing of novel bioactive Mg-containing silicate scaffolds for alveolar bone regeneration.
    Goudouri OM; Vogel C; Grünewald A; Detsch R; Kontonasaki E; Boccaccini AR
    J Biomater Appl; 2016 Jan; 30(6):740-9. PubMed ID: 25972398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.