190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27335091)
41. The Blonde d'Aquitaine T3811>G3811 mutation in the myostatin gene: association with growth, carcass, and muscle phenotypes in veal calves.
Vinet A; Bouyer C; Forestier L; Oulmouden A; Blanquet V; Picard B; Cassar-Malek I; Bonnet M; Rocha D; Renand G
J Anim Sci; 2021 Feb; 99(2):. PubMed ID: 33624102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Detection of selection signatures within candidate regions underlying trypanotolerance in outbred cattle populations.
Dayo GK; Thevenon S; Berthier D; Moazami-Goudarzi K; Denis C; Cuny G; Eggen A; Gautier M
Mol Ecol; 2009 Apr; 18(8):1801-13. PubMed ID: 19302350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Direct and maternal genetic relationships between calving ease, gestation length, milk production, fertility, type, and lifespan of Holstein-Friesian primiparous cows.
Eaglen SA; Coffey MP; Woolliams JA; Wall E
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jun; 96(6):4015-25. PubMed ID: 23548304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Multi-trait meta-analyses reveal 25 quantitative trait loci for economically important traits in Brown Swiss cattle.
Fang ZH; Pausch H
BMC Genomics; 2019 Sep; 20(1):695. PubMed ID: 31481029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Quantitative trait loci mapping of calving and conformation traits on Bos taurus autosome 18 in the German Holstein population.
Brand B; Baes C; Mayer M; Reinsch N; Seidenspinner T; Thaller G; Kühn Ch
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1205-15. PubMed ID: 20172241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Genetic relationships between calving performance and beef production traits in Piemontese cattle.
Albera A; Groen AF; Carnier P
J Anim Sci; 2004 Dec; 82(12):3440-6. PubMed ID: 15537762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP.
van den Berg S; Calus MP; Meuwissen TH; Wientjes YC
BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():146. PubMed ID: 26698836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle.
Neuner S; Emmerling R; Thaller G; Götz KU
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4344-54. PubMed ID: 18946140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in the Blonde d'Aquitaine cattle breed.
Beghain J; Boitard S; Weiss B; Boussaha M; Gut I; Rocha D
J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Aug; 130(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 23855631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. On the use of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction and fine-scale mapping of QTL.
Meuwissen T; van den Berg I; Goddard M
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):19. PubMed ID: 33637049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Accuracy of direct genomic breeding values for nationally evaluated traits in US Limousin and Simmental beef cattle.
Saatchi M; Schnabel RD; Rolf MM; Taylor JF; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Dec; 44(1):38. PubMed ID: 23216608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Genetic analysis of calf market weight and carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle.
Shojo M; Okanishi T; Anada K; Oyama K; Mukai F
J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct; 84(10):2617-22. PubMed ID: 16971561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Genetic parameters, heterosis, and breed effects for body condition score and mature cow weight in beef cattle.
Ribeiro AMF; Sanglard LP; Snelling WM; Thallman RM; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35044465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Quantitative trait loci affecting calving traits in Danish Holstein cattle.
Thomasen JR; Guldbrandtsen B; Sørensen P; Thomsen B; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2008 May; 91(5):2098-105. PubMed ID: 18420641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Importance of adaptation and genotype × environment interactions in tropical beef breeding systems.
Burrow HM
Animal; 2012 May; 6(5):729-40. PubMed ID: 22558921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Genome-wide association study of growth in crossbred beef cattle.
Snelling WM; Allan MF; Keele JW; Kuehn LA; McDaneld T; Smith TP; Sonstegard TS; Thallman RM; Bennett GL
J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):837-48. PubMed ID: 19966163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
