200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27336366)
1. 3D Mandibular Superimposition: Comparison of Regions of Reference for Voxel-Based Registration.
Ruellas AC; Yatabe MS; Souki BQ; Benavides E; Nguyen T; Luiz RR; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157625. PubMed ID: 27336366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography.
Ruellas AC; Huanca Ghislanzoni LT; Gomes MR; Danesi C; Lione R; Nguyen T; McNamara JA; Cozza P; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 27021458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid 3D mandibular superimposition for growing patients.
Koerich L; Weissheimer A; de Menezes LM; Lindauer SJ
Angle Orthod; 2017 May; 87(3):473-479. PubMed ID: 27767348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods.
Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Common 3-dimensional coordinate system for assessment of directional changes.
Ruellas AC; Tonello C; Gomes LR; Yatabe MS; Macron L; Lopinto J; Goncalves JR; Garib Carreira DG; Alonso N; Souki BQ; Coqueiro Rda S; Cevidanes LH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 May; 149(5):645-56. PubMed ID: 27131246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional mandibular regional superimposition in growing patients.
Nguyen T; Cevidanes L; Franchi L; Ruellas A; Jackson T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):747-754. PubMed ID: 29706223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The three-dimensional stable mandibular landmarks in patients between the ages of 12.5 and 17.1 years.
Chen G; Al Awadi M; Chambers DW; Lagravère-Vich MO; Xu T; Oh H
BMC Oral Health; 2020 May; 20(1):153. PubMed ID: 32460733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of voxel- and surface-based cone-beam computed tomography mandibular superimposition in adult orthodontic patients.
Han G; Li J; Wang S; Wang L; Zhou Y; Liu Y
J Int Med Res; 2021 Jan; 49(1):300060520982708. PubMed ID: 33459090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of a stable reference area for superimposing mandibular digital models.
An K; Jang I; Choi DS; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Cha BK
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Nov; 76(6):508-19. PubMed ID: 26250456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Natural reference structures for three-dimensional maxillary regional superimposition in growing patients.
Fan Y; Han B; Zhang Y; Guo Y; Li W; Chen H; Meng C; Penington A; Schneider P; Pei Y; Chen G; Xu T
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Sep; 23(1):655. PubMed ID: 37684645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition using cone beam computed tomography: a validation study.
Koerich L; Burns D; Weissheimer A; Claus JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 45(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 26794399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and reliability of mandibular digital model registration with use of the mucogingival junction as the reference.
Ioshida M; Muñoz BA; Rios H; Cevidanes L; Aristizabal JF; Rey D; Kim-Berman H; Yatabe M; Benavides E; Alvarez MA; Volk S; Ruellas AC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Apr; 127(4):351-360. PubMed ID: 30472195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular growth and tooth eruption.
Krarup S; Darvann TA; Larsen P; Marsh JL; Kreiborg S
J Anat; 2005 Nov; 207(5):669-82. PubMed ID: 16313399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional mandibular superimposition techniques against Björk's structural superimposition method.
Franco CS; Sexton C; Flores-Mir C; Healey D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Mar; 159(3):e253-e273. PubMed ID: 33541785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-based three-dimensional superimposition of the growing mandible in a rabbit model.
Parton AL; Duncan WJ; Oliveira ME; Key O; Farella M
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):546-52. PubMed ID: 26609073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of intended manual condylar positioning on skeletal and dental changes in Skeletal Class III deformities: CBCT-generated half-cephalograms.
Hwang DS; Kim YI; Lee KM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 23434240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three dimensional quantification of mandibular bone remodeling using standard tessellation language registration based superimposition.
Ahmad R; Abu-Hassan MI; Li Q; Swain MV
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1273-9. PubMed ID: 22862429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement error and reliability of three available 3D superimposition methods in growing patients.
Ponce-Garcia C; Ruellas ACO; Cevidanes LHS; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Lagravere-Vich M
Head Face Med; 2020 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 31987041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
