These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27336415)
1. On the design of closed recapture experiments. Alunni Fegatelli D; Farcomeni A Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1273-1294. PubMed ID: 27336415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A continuous time version and a generalization of a Markov-recapture model for trapping experiments. Alpizar-Jara R; Smith CE Math Biosci; 2008; 214(1-2):11-9. PubMed ID: 18556026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A general class of recapture models based on the conditional capture probabilities. Farcomeni A Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 26355633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimum chi-square method for estimating population size in capture-recapture experiments. Zheng Y; Mao Y; Tsao M; Cowen LLE PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292622. PubMed ID: 37824521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The minimum capture proportion for reliable estimation in capture-recapture models. Xi L; Watson R; Yip PS Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):242-9. PubMed ID: 17680836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maximum likelihood estimation for model Mt,α for capture-recapture data with misidentification. Vale RT; Fewster RM; Carroll EL; Patenaude NJ Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):962-71. PubMed ID: 24942186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A unified likelihood-based approach for estimating population size in continuous-time capture-recapture experiments with frailty. Xi L; Yip PS; Watson R Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):228-36. PubMed ID: 17447949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of spatial capture-recapture models with repurposed data: Assessing estimator robustness for retrospective applications. Smith JB; Stevens BS; Etter DR; Williams DM PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236978. PubMed ID: 32797083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Capture-recapture when time and behavioral response affect capture probabilities. Chao A; Chu W; Hsu CH Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):427-33. PubMed ID: 10877300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Upper bound estimators of the population size based on ordinal models for capture-recapture experiments. Alfò M; Böhning D; Rocchetti I Biometrics; 2021 Mar; 77(1):237-248. PubMed ID: 32282946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrating acoustic telemetry into mark-recapture models to improve the precision of apparent survival and abundance estimates. Dudgeon CL; Pollock KH; Braccini JM; Semmens JM; Barnett A Oecologia; 2015 Jul; 178(3):761-72. PubMed ID: 25740335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonidentifiability of population size from capture-recapture data with heterogeneous detection probabilities. Link WA Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1123-30. PubMed ID: 14969493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture-recapture analysis of data from area searches. Efford MG Ecology; 2011 Dec; 92(12):2202-7. PubMed ID: 22352159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the size of an open population using sparse capture-recapture data. Huggins R; Stoklosa J; Roach C; Yip P Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):280-288. PubMed ID: 28632891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interval estimation for Poisson capture-recapture models in epidemiology. Farrington CP Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3079-92. PubMed ID: 12369083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robust estimation of population size in closed animal populations from capture-recapture experiments. Pollock KH; Otto MC Biometrics; 1983 Dec; 39(4):1035-49. PubMed ID: 6671118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]