These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27336842)

  • 1. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
    Widmer KH
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.
    Widmer KH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH; Majewski M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T; Doi H
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion].
    Sendtner E; Müller M; Winkler R; Wörner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The association between Femoral Tilt and impingement-free range-of-motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Renkawitz T; Haimerl M; Dohmen L; Gneiting S; Lechler P; Woerner M; Springorum HR; Weber M; Sussmann P; Sendtner E; Grifka J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 May; 13():65. PubMed ID: 22559740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Small Random Angular Variations in Pelvic Tilt and Lower Extremity Can Cause Error in Static Image-based Preoperative Hip Arthroplasty Planning: A Computer Modeling Study.
    Eslam Pour A; Lazennec JY; Patel KP; Anjaria MP; Beaulé PE; Schwarzkopf R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Apr; 480(4):818-828. PubMed ID: 35014975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.
    Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cup safe zone and optimal stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty for patients with highly required range of motion.
    Habe Y; Hamada H; Uemura K; Takashima K; Ando W; Sugano N
    J Orthop Res; 2024 Jun; 42(6):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 38084832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Even the Intraoperative Knowledge of Femoral Stem Anteversion Cannot Prevent Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Weber M; Woerner ML; Sendtner E; Völlner F; Grifka J; Renkawitz TF
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2514-2519. PubMed ID: 27236745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The optimal combined anteversion pattern to achieve a favorable impingement-free angle in total hip arthroplasty.
    Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Inoue D; Taga T; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Ueoka K; Tsuchiya H
    J Orthop Sci; 2019 May; 24(3):474-481. PubMed ID: 30554937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement.
    McCarthy TF; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Alipit V; Wagner TC; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3544-3549. PubMed ID: 28712801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15519347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acetabular Cup Anteversion and Inclination in Hip Range of Motion to Impingement.
    McCarthy TF; Alipit V; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):264-8. PubMed ID: 27067753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo kinematic analysis of replaced hip during stationary cycling and computer simulation of optimal cup positioning against prosthetic impingement.
    Komiyama K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Higaki H; Shiomoto K; Gondo H; Hara D; Wang Y; Nakashima Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2019 Aug; 68():175-181. PubMed ID: 31229697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Theoretical relationships between component design, patient bone geometry and range-of-motion post hip resurfacing.
    Ellison P
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Mar; 226(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 22558839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Imageless Navigation With the Concept of Combined Anteversion.
    Chang JD; Kim IS; Prabhakar S; Mansukhani SA; Lee SS; Yoo JH
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1576-1580. PubMed ID: 28139342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer simulation based on in vivo kinematics of a replaced hip during chair-rising for elucidating target cup and stem positioning with a safety range of hip rotation.
    Shiomoto K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Higaki H; Hara D; Gondo H; Komiyama K; Yoshimoto K; Harada S; Nakashima Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2022 Jan; 91():105537. PubMed ID: 34847472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.