216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27336871)
1. Different lymph node staging systems in patients with gastric cancer from Korean: What is the best prognostic assessment tool?
Lee JW; Ali B; Park CH; Song KY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jun; 95(25):e3860. PubMed ID: 27336871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superiority of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) for prognostic prediction after gastric cancer surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of 7620 patients in China.
Gu P; Deng J; Sun Z; Wang Z; Wang W; Liang H; Xu H; Zhou Z
Surg Today; 2021 Jan; 51(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 32754844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in predicting overall survival for gastric cancer patients after radical resection].
Luo C; Zhang G; Wang W; Zhou Z; Zhang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 19(10):1107-1112. PubMed ID: 27781245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic assessment of different metastatic lymph node staging methods for gastric cancer after D2 resection.
Xu J; Bian YH; Jin X; Cao H
World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Mar; 19(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 23569344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic value of three different lymph node staging systems in the survival of patients with gastric cancer following D2 lymphadenectomy.
Jian-Hui C; Shi-Rong C; Hui W; Si-le C; Jian-Bo X; Er-Tao Z; Chuang-Qi C; Yu-Long H
Tumour Biol; 2016 Aug; 37(8):11105-13. PubMed ID: 26912060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection.
Sun Z; Xu Y; Li de M; Wang ZN; Zhu GL; Huang BJ; Li K; Xu HM
Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11):2571-80. PubMed ID: 20336791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prognostic value of three different staging schemes based on pN, MLR and LODDS in patients with T3 esophageal cancer].
Wang L; Cai L; Chen Q; Jiang YH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):749-753. PubMed ID: 29061018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The RML of lymph node metastasis was superior to the LODDS for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer.
Liu H; Deng J; Zhang R; Hao X; Jiao X; Liang H
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 23541652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic assessment of different lymph node staging methods for pancreatic cancer with R0 resection: pN staging, lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes.
La Torre M; Nigri G; Petrucciani N; Cavallini M; Aurello P; Cosenza G; Balducci G; Ziparo V; Ramacciato G
Pancreatology; 2014; 14(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 25062879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS): what are their role in the prognostic assessment of gastric adenocarcinoma?
Aurello P; Petrucciani N; Nigri GR; La Torre M; Magistri P; Tierno S; D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Jul; 18(7):1254-60. PubMed ID: 24841441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The relationship between the index of lymph node metastasis and the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients after R0 resection].
Ren H; Wang CF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 42(6):474-479. PubMed ID: 32575943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The assessment of the optimal number of examined lymph nodes and prognostic models based on lymph nodes for predicting survival outcome in patients with stage N3b gastric cancer.
Guo S; Shang M; Dong Z; Zhang J; Wang Y; Zhao Y
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2021 Apr; 17(2):e117-e124. PubMed ID: 32762113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Log odds of positive lymph nodes as a novel prognostic predictor for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Y; Wu G; Liu J; Zhang Y; Yang W; Wang X; Duan L; Niu L; Chen J; Zhou W; Han W; Wang J; Zhong H; Ji G; Fan D; Hong L
BMC Cancer; 2023 Jun; 23(1):523. PubMed ID: 37291493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in evaluating the prognosis of patients with pT3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Liu DT; Wang LS; Chen YP; Chen SB
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17161. PubMed ID: 33051518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of the log odds of positive lymph nodes to predict and discriminate prognosis in gastric carcinomas.
Calero A; Escrig-Sos J; Mingol F; Arroyo A; Martinez-Ramos D; de Juan M; Salvador-Sanchis JL; Garcia-Granero E; Calpena R; Lacueva FJ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2015 May; 19(5):813-20. PubMed ID: 25560183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Prognostic Ability of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Lee CC; Ho HC; Su YC; Lee MS; Hung SK; Chen YL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Jul; 94(27):e1069. PubMed ID: 26166079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in colon and rectal cancer patient stratification: a single-center analysis of 323 patients.
Scarinci A; Di Cesare T; Cavaniglia D; Neri T; Colletti M; Cosenza G; Liverani A
Updates Surg; 2018 Mar; 70(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 29500795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What is the most accurate lymph node staging method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Comparison of UICC/AJCC pN stage, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes.
Conci S; Ruzzenente A; Sandri M; Bertuzzo F; Campagnaro T; Bagante F; Capelli P; D'Onofrio M; Piccino M; Dorna AE; Pedrazzani C; Iacono C; Guglielmi A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):743-750. PubMed ID: 28094085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio on gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy.
Huang CM; Lin JX; Zheng CH; Li P; Xie JW; Lin BJ; Wang JB
World J Gastroenterol; 2010 Apr; 16(16):2055-60. PubMed ID: 20419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
