These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27337512)

  • 1. The development of action planning in a joint action context.
    Paulus M
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Jul; 52(7):1052-63. PubMed ID: 27337512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of the grasp height effect as a measure of efficient action planning in children.
    Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jan; 153():74-82. PubMed ID: 27701010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planning my actions to accommodate yours: joint action development during early childhood.
    Meyer M; van der Wel RP; Hunnius S
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2016 May; 371(1693):. PubMed ID: 27069048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of motor coordination during joint action in mid-childhood.
    Satta E; Ferrari-Toniolo S; Visco-Comandini F; Caminiti R; Battaglia-Mayer A
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Oct; 105():111-122. PubMed ID: 28454687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development of co-representation effects in a joint task: do children represent a co-actor?
    Milward SJ; Kita S; Apperly IA
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 24853630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anticipatory action planning increases from 3 to 10 years of age in typically developing children.
    Jongbloed-Pereboom M; Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW; Saraber-Schiphorst N; Crajé C; Steenbergen B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Feb; 114(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 23026314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of multiple planning constraints on the development of grasp posture planning in 6- to 10-year-old children.
    Stöckel T; Hughes CM
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Sep; 51(9):1254-61. PubMed ID: 26192045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of tool use: Planning for end-state comfort.
    Comalli DM; Keen R; Abraham ES; Foo VJ; Lee MH; Adolph KE
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Nov; 52(11):1878-1892. PubMed ID: 27786531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Index of difficulty and side of space are accommodated during the selection and planning of a joint action.
    Ray M; de Grosbois J; Welsh TN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Aug; 54():197-209. PubMed ID: 28527422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Co-representation of others' task constraints in joint action.
    Schmitz L; Vesper C; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1480-1493. PubMed ID: 28368165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social categorization and cooperation in motor joint action: evidence for a joint end-state comfort.
    Dötsch D; Schubö A
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Aug; 233(8):2323-34. PubMed ID: 25963752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task.
    McClung JS; Jentzsch I; Reicher SD
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79178. PubMed ID: 24278119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joint action changes valence-based action coding in an implicit attitude task.
    Stenzel A; Liepelt R
    Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):889-903. PubMed ID: 26215432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distinct kinematic markers of demonstration and joint action coordination? Evidence from virtual xylophone playing.
    McEllin L; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):885-897. PubMed ID: 29154627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mutual coordination strengthens the sense of joint agency in cooperative joint action.
    Bolt NK; Poncelet EM; Schultz BG; Loehr JD
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Nov; 46():173-187. PubMed ID: 27764684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Higher-order action planning for individual and joint object manipulations.
    Meyer M; van der Wel RP; Hunnius S
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 225(4):579-88. PubMed ID: 23361302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3- and 5-year-old children's adherence to explicit and implicit joint commitments.
    Kachel U; Tomasello M
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 55(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 30359057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are tool properties always processed automatically? The role of tool use context and task complexity.
    Randerath J; Martin KR; Frey SH
    Cortex; 2013 Jun; 49(6):1679-93. PubMed ID: 23026760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive representation of other people's actions in joint action planning: an EEG study.
    Kourtis D; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 22671131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imitation of coordinated actions: How do children perceive relations between different parts?
    Milward SJ; Sebanz N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0189717. PubMed ID: 29298354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.